Re: Bug in catchException()

2009-09-09 Thread Attila Szegedi
On 2009.09.09., at 0:15, John Rose wrote: The root cause is a known bug. One workaround is to put your app. classes on the boot CP. The bug happens when app. class names appear in signatures of methods referred to by direct MHs or by MH.invoke. Yeah, I noticed that elsewhere too -- tried to

hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: indy.compiler.inline: Various bugfixes and improvements.

2009-09-09 Thread Christian . Thalinger
Changeset: 992cf4a18b98 Author:twisti Date: 2009-09-09 15:04 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/992cf4a18b98 indy.compiler.inline: Various bugfixes and improvements. ! indy.compiler.inline.patch ___ mlvm-dev

Re: C/C++ mismatches with PTR_FORMAT

2009-09-09 Thread Christian Thalinger
Raffaello Giulietti wrote: Hi, the 4.3.3 gcc compiler I'm using statically checks format specifications in the *printf family of functions. While building the *debug* version of the mlvm, the build stops with 4 errors about a mismatch between a format specification and the actual arguments.

still no fun with invokedynamic

2009-09-09 Thread Jochen Theodorou
hi all, I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as always quuite complicated. This time I created a chroot envrionment for 32 bit, that was where I last time had to stop. I managed to get it compiled by the patch that was provided here 5 months ago and finally had

Re: still no fun with invokedynamic

2009-09-09 Thread Rémi Forax
Le 09/09/2009 20:42, Jochen Theodorou a écrit : hi all, I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as always quuite complicated. This time I created a chroot envrionment for 32 bit, that was where I last time had to stop. I managed to get it compiled by the patch

Re: still no fun with invokedynamic

2009-09-09 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Rémi Forax schrieb: Le 09/09/2009 20:42, Jochen Theodorou a écrit : hi all, I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as always quuite complicated. This time I created a chroot envrionment for 32 bit, that was where I last time had to stop. I managed to get it

Re: still no fun with invokedynamic

2009-09-09 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Jochen Theodorou schrieb: Rémi Forax schrieb: Le 09/09/2009 20:42, Jochen Theodorou a écrit : hi all, I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as always quuite complicated. This time I created a chroot envrionment for 32 bit, that was where I last time had to

Re: still no fun with invokedynamic

2009-09-09 Thread Rémi Forax
Le 09/09/2009 20:55, Jochen Theodorou a écrit : Jochen Theodorou schrieb: Rémi Forax schrieb: Le 09/09/2009 20:42, Jochen Theodorou a écrit : hi all, I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as always quuite complicated. This time I created a

Re: still no fun with invokedynamic

2009-09-09 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Rémi Forax schrieb: [...] and java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic FidgetDemo java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic FidgetDemo # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # Internal Error