When trying MLVM, I have make the following test as in attachment
Test.java.
I have compiled and runned it three times (cf. cmd.log) with bad
expected behaviour (only partial loop, not running up to 10), and
one time with a crash (cf. hs_err_pid1008.log).
Are these problems already
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 09:46 +0100, Daniel Latrémolière wrote:
C:\Users\daniel\Documents\NetBeansProjects\Test\srcC:\Program
Files\Java\jdk1.7.0\bin\java.exe -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions
-XX:+EnableMethodHandles -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic Test
Direct (10): 313
Handle (25740): 133
Le 26/01/2010 09:46, Daniel Latrémolière a écrit :
When trying MLVM, I have make the following test as in attachment
Test.java.
I have compiled and runned it three times (cf. cmd.log) with bad
expected behaviour (only partial loop, not running up to 10), and
one time with a crash (cf.
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:45 +0100, Rémi Forax wrote:
Christian and John,
I've also noticed that the code written should not compile,
invoking a method handle with invoke() can throw any throwable
and it seems that javac patch to require to catch/throws Throwable
was not pushed to jdk7 main
Le 26/01/2010 09:46, Daniel Latrémolière a écrit :
When trying MLVM, I have make the following test as in attachment
Test.java.
I have compiled and runned it three times (cf. cmd.log) with bad
expected behaviour (only partial loop, not running up to 10), and
one time with a crash (cf.
I took me some time to see the actual problem: there's no JSR 292
support for the client compiler yet. I'm currently working on that and
it's almost finished.
To successfully run your test use the server compiler:
java.exe -server -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableMethodHandles
When trying MLVM, I have make the following test as in attachment
Test.java.
I have compiled and runned it three times (cf. cmd.log) with bad
expected behaviour (only partial loop, not running up to 10), and
one time with a crash (cf. hs_err_pid1008.log).
Are these problems already
What is the current status of tailcalls meet invokedynamic? I mean,
not the interesting entry in John's blog but the status in the
implementation?
And what about
* AnonymousClasses
* ImmediateWrappers
* TupleSignatures
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
Changeset: d6dbb6e6c4b2
Author:twisti
Date: 2010-01-26 14:41 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/d6dbb6e6c4b2
indy-c1-x86: New patch.
+ indy-c1-x86.patch
! series
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
On Jan 26, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
Good questions; thanks Raffaello.
What is the current status of tailcalls meet invokedynamic? I mean,
not the interesting entry in John's blog but the status in the
implementation?
It's not yet started. It requires some pretty
On Jan 26, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Mohamed Bana wrote:
Perhaps Sun
Well, it's probably perhaps Oracle any time now; we'll see how things shake
out.
In any case, Sun doesn't do such side-projects, so much as they are created
by individual overworked but entrepreneurial engineers and engineering
Changeset: 2b8bce60ef94
Author:jrose
Date: 2010-01-26 23:42 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/2b8bce60ef94
dynopt, trustfinal: update to match JDK7 pushes
! dynopt-6912064.patch
! trustfinal-6912065.patch
___
12 matches
Mail list logo