I know you are all working hard to bring 292 to a release so I thought I
would take a moment
to thank you all for your work and to tell you how much that work helped
with our Smalltalk
porting.
We have about 500K lines of Smalltalk code which we want to run on the
JVM. The approach we
picked
John wrote
If the desired MethodType is available, you can also use
MethodType.parameterList to get a List of the parameters (at O(1) likely
allocation cost). From thatlist you can also subList to
specify the desired dropped parameter types.
Interesting thought. Upon
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
I know you are all working hard to bring 292 to a release so I thought I
would take a moment
to thank you all for your work and to tell you how much that work helped with
our Smalltalk
porting.
We have about 500K lines of Smalltalk code
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
John Rose wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
This webrev adds support for JSR 292 to Zero:
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
John Rose wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
This webrev adds support for
Hi Christian,
I've always liked your enthusiasm
So far we are running on OSX and the latest win7 build. both work fine.
Now that we have the core running we need to move to java.lang.invoke (
which should be trivial).
What is it you like to look at? Once we make the move I could package up
In addition to the actual code of the gwt test there is currently a poll-based
test for call site mutation. Eventually this will be replaced by a notification
with zero fast path overhead.
-- John (on my iPhone)
On Apr 11, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Rémi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
Bottom line,
