Re: mlvm build with coroutines -- but coro tests fail

2011-05-04 Thread Lukas Stadler
Hm - that seems weird. Could you perhaps do me a favour and check if both coro.patch and coro-meth.patch are being applied? I had to split off a part of the patch that has to be applied differently if the meth patches are present. So now it's either coro-standalone.patch and coro.patch or

Re: mlvm build with coroutines -- but coro tests fail

2011-05-04 Thread Lukas Stadler
On 05/03/2011 11:22 PM, Rémi Forax wrote: On 05/03/2011 10:53 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: Brainstorming coro package names... java.lang.invoke isn't bad, perhaps, but it is a different form of invocation than invokedynamic. This is a core JVM feature, so something under java.lang

hg: mlvm/mlvm/jdk: meth-conv: use ricochet frames, improve argument spreading

2011-05-04 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: 822943dfec86 Author:jrose Date: 2011-05-04 05:35 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/822943dfec86 meth-conv: use ricochet frames, improve argument spreading ! meth-conv-6939861.patch ___ mlvm-dev mailing

hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: meth-conv: process exceptions through ricochets, improve argument spreading

2011-05-04 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: 23a80231951e Author:jrose Date: 2011-05-04 05:36 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/23a80231951e meth-conv: process exceptions through ricochets, improve argument spreading ! meth-conv-6939861.patch

Re: hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: meth-conv: process exceptions through ricochets, improve argument spreading

2011-05-04 Thread John Rose
On May 4, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote: I don't know how you get over this: src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: conflicting declaration ‘OopClosure* f’ src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: ‘f’ has a previous declaration as ‘const frame f’ A

Re: hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: meth-conv: process exceptions through ricochets, improve argument spreading

2011-05-04 Thread Christian Thalinger
On May 4, 2011, at 3:08 PM, John Rose wrote: On May 4, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote: I don't know how you get over this: src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: conflicting declaration ‘OopClosure* f’ src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: ‘f’ has a

hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: meth-conv: review comment

2011-05-04 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: 6dfee218b9a7 Author:jrose Date: 2011-05-04 20:02 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/6dfee218b9a7 meth-conv: review comment ! meth-conv-6939861.patch ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net

hg: mlvm/mlvm/jdk: meth-conv: unit test coverage 80% of adapter types

2011-05-04 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: 98c8fe482b11 Author:jrose Date: 2011-05-04 20:04 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/98c8fe482b11 meth-conv: unit test coverage 80% of adapter types ! meth-conv-6939861.patch ___ mlvm-dev mailing list