hg: mlvm/mlvm/jdk: meth-conv: add ValueConversionsTest to test low-level argument processing machinery

2011-05-11 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: 3a4681bc712d Author:jrose Date: 2011-05-10 16:03 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/3a4681bc712d meth-conv: add ValueConversionsTest to test low-level argument processing machinery ! meth-conv-6939861.patch

hg: mlvm/mlvm/jdk: Test6998541 updated

2011-05-11 Thread christian . thalinger
Changeset: 961bae798841 Author:twisti Date: 2011-05-11 02:18 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/961bae798841 Test6998541 updated ! meth.patch ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net

Re: review request (M): 7034977: JSR 292 MethodHandle.invokeGeneric should be renamed MethodHandle.invoke

2011-05-11 Thread John Rose
Yes. Public API now. Some of those names are (sadly) known to the vm. -- John (on my iPhone) On May 11, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Tom Rodriguez tom.rodrig...@oracle.com wrote: What about notifyGenericMethodType? Should that be notifyGeneralMethodType? There are others like ToGeneric and

Re: review request (M): 7034977: JSR 292 MethodHandle.invokeGeneric should be renamed MethodHandle.invoke

2011-05-11 Thread John Rose
Oh, and thanks! :-) -- John (on my iPhone) On May 11, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Tom Rodriguez tom.rodrig...@oracle.com wrote: Looks good ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Re: JSR 292 cookbook

2011-05-11 Thread Mark Roos
Hi Rémi Covering constants using method handles is minor but I found it important for my work. And If you are covering the gamut of VM requirements then some discussion of mapping non java objects to java objects would be helpful. Especially the few type constraints the jvm ( or class

Re: JSR 292 cookbook

2011-05-11 Thread Rémi Forax
On 05/11/2011 08:08 PM, Mark Roos wrote: Hi Rémi Covering constants using method handles is minor but I found it important for my work. I try for that talk to be not too close to the API but more use case oriented. So instead of constant mh, do you agree that the UC is lazy initialization

Re: review request (M): 7034977: JSR 292 MethodHandle.invokeGeneric should be renamed MethodHandle.invoke

2011-05-11 Thread John Rose
Thanks, Christian. -- John On May 11, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote: On May 11, 2011, at 6:02 PM, John Rose wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/7034977/webrev.00 This is the engineering review for the name changes to remove the term generic from JSR 292. Looks

Re: JSR 292 cookbook

2011-05-11 Thread Mark Roos
Rémi said I try for that talk to be not too close to the API but more use case oriented. So instead of constant mh, do you agree that the UC is lazy initialization ? or do you have another UC in min The case I ran into was one of needing non java constants ( objects of my own types) and thus