On Aug 8, 2011, at 8:21 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Aug 8, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin...@oracle.com wrote:
Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin...@oracle.com wrote:
Here are the numbers for JDK 7 b147, 7071307+7071653, and
7071307+7071653+7071709:
7071307: MethodHandle bimorphic inlining should consider the frequency
7071653: JSR 292: call site change notification
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
I guess my concern is that the original (long) version may or may not
inline, but obviously doesn't degrade as badly. Why does the degraded
performance of the long form suffer so much? Ruby is a very terse
On Jul 28, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
On 2011-07-28 10.11, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
The bad performance sounds like something is not inlined at all.
How are you invoking valueMH? Via invokedynamic or a direct MH
call?
valueMH is
I guess my concern is that the original (long) version may or may not
inline, but obviously doesn't degrade as badly. Why does the degraded
performance of the long form suffer so much? Ruby is a very terse
language, often resulting in methods that represent a lot of code. I'm
using
Hello everyone!
I have added a few new items to JRuby relating to invokedynamic. Let's
dive in, shall we?
1. invokedynamic-based dispatch for literal binary operators with RHS
a literal fixnum or float
This is actually on by default because it didn't seem to hurt perf
(much?) on JDK7, and it
