John Rose wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Christian,
the inlining patch currently doesn't work :(
in methodHandleWalk.hpp (line 322) :
int cpool_oop_reference_put(int tag, int first_index, int
second_index) {
if (index == 0) return 0; // this line
I just pushed that fix. I also pushed (what I hope are) the fixes for
the last GC bugs. Please let me know what happens.
-- John
On Sep 12, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Ha! Thanks for the explanation, I didn't understand how this compiles
for me :-)
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:21 AM, John Rose john.r...@sun.com wrote:
I just pushed that fix. I also pushed (what I hope are) the fixes for
the last GC bugs. Please let me know what happens.
Updated numbers for Surinx, new build as of a few minutes ago:
~/projects/surinx ➔ jruby --server
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Rémi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
First, Charles, there is a bug in compiler.rb that prevent me to use Surinx.
This bug was already present in Duby but I don't remember if I report it or
not.
The compiler generate a LDC + forName with a name containing slash
Le 11/09/2009 14:43, Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Rémi Foraxfo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
First, Charles, there is a bug in compiler.rb that prevent me to use Surinx.
This bug was already present in Duby but I don't remember if I report it or
not.
The
On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Christian,
the inlining patch currently doesn't work :(
in methodHandleWalk.hpp (line 322) :
int cpool_oop_reference_put(int tag, int first_index, int
second_index) {
if (index == 0) return 0; // this line doesn't compile
That's
