Christian Thalinger wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
client still crashes for me with bench_fib_recursive, but server runs
This crash happens because of the non-static final field changes I made,
the client compiler does not know about them. I will fix that.
Well... since C1 does not
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
client still crashes for me with bench_fib_recursive, but server runs
This crash happens because of the non-static final field changes I made,
the client compiler does not know about them. I will fix that.
-- Christian
Ok...I did an updated build, and things are definitely better in the
crash department. But I wonder if I'm not getting all the appropriate
patches applied...
client still crashes for me with bench_fib_recursive, but server runs
successfully, albeit very slowly, about 10x slower than non-indy
FYI, here's the results of qpush -a...I notice the compiler.inline
patch isn't applying because it's -testable:
~/projects/davinci ➔ sh patches/make/each-patch-repo.sh 'hg qpush -a'
+ (cd sources/hotspot; hg qpush -a)
applying 6833129.patch
applying 6873116.patch
applying meth-6862576.patch
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
FYI, here's the results of qpush -a...I notice the compiler.inline
patch isn't applying because it's -testable:
~/projects/davinci ➔ sh patches/make/each-patch-repo.sh 'hg qpush -a'
+ (cd sources/hotspot; hg qpush -a)
applying 6833129.patch
applying
On Aug 23, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
client still crashes for me
While this shouldn't happen at all, note that our focus is presently
on server.
The crashes we want to see (if that makes sense!) are with the server
compiler and inlining turned on.
Thanks for jumping
Hi!
Sorry for the long delay on this one, but we had to sort out some stuff
about this patch upstream.
Finally, this change fixes the crashes you have seen in javac (no need
for -J-Xint anymore). Please let me know if something still fails.
-- Christian
Yes! Thanks for slogging through this one, Christian.
-- John (on my iPhone)
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:52 AM, Christian Thalinger christian.thalin...@sun.com
wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for the long delay on this one, but we had to sort out some
stuff
about this patch upstream.
Finally, this
