Re: review request (L): 6939861: JVM should handle more conversion operations

2011-05-06 Thread Christian Thalinger
On May 5, 2011, at 1:16 PM, John Rose wrote: I have finished the last large chunk of JVM work for JDK 7 JSR 292, the implementation of so-called ricochet frames. Here it is for review: 6939861: JVM should handle more conversion operations

Re: review request (L): 6939861: JVM should handle more conversion operations

2011-05-06 Thread John Rose
On May 5, 2011, at 11:58 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote: On May 5, 2011, at 1:16 PM, John Rose wrote: I have finished the last large chunk of JVM work for JDK 7 JSR 292, the implementation of so-called ricochet frames. Here it is for review: 6939861: JVM should handle more conversion

Re: review request (L): 6939861: JVM should handle more conversion operations

2011-05-06 Thread Christian Thalinger
On May 6, 2011, at 9:27 AM, John Rose wrote: All new header files have the wrong (Sun) copyright header. I'm backing off from introducing new header files. The only new file is methodHandles_x86.hpp. See what you think. The idea is to allow each port to control its own individual

review request (L): 6939861: JVM should handle more conversion operations

2011-05-05 Thread John Rose
I have finished the last large chunk of JVM work for JDK 7 JSR 292, the implementation of so-called ricochet frames. Here it is for review: 6939861: JVM should handle more conversion operations http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/6939861/webrev.04/ This work started in April 2010 and was