Question: is JEP 169 still under active development or has it been
merged into the more general Value types for Java proposal below?
It has been merged into the more general Value Types for Java proposal.
The Value types for Java approach clearly seems to be the most
general but also the most
Am 29.01.2015 12:02, schrieb Daniel Latrémolière:
I just want to quickly summarize my
current findings here and gently ask for feedback in case you think
I've totally misunderstood something. Of course any comments and
additional information is highly welcome as well.
I don't know if that can
I just want to quickly summarize my
current findings here and gently ask for feedback in case you think
I've totally misunderstood something. Of course any comments and
additional information is highly welcome as well.
I don't know if that can be useful, but here is my point of view of
Thanks, John!
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 1/29/15 6:10 AM, John Rose wrote:
Good. Consider fixing the typo in 'makeBlockInlningWrapper'. — John
On Jan 28, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Vladimir Ivanov vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com
wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8071787/webrev.00/
Thanks, John!
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 1/29/15 6:11 AM, John Rose wrote:
Good.
On Jan 28, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Vladimir Ivanov
vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com mailto:vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com wrote:
The fix is to use adapted MethodHandle to construct LambdaForm.
Trying to remember compiler implementation details this sounds reasonable and
is a bug (or an enhancement, actually ;-). Can someone file a bug?
On Jan 7, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
wrote:
This could explain performance regressions we've seen on the
On Jan 29, 2015, at 4:48 PM, John Rose john.r.r...@oracle.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2015, at 8:13 AM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr
mailto:fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
But if fibo is called through an invokedynamic, instead of emitting a direct
call to fibo,
the JIT generates a code that push
On Jan 7, 2015, at 8:13 AM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
But if fibo is called through an invokedynamic, instead of emitting a direct
call to fibo,
the JIT generates a code that push the method handle on stack and execute it
like if the metod handle was not constant
(the method
On 01/30/2015 01:48 AM, John Rose wrote:
On Jan 7, 2015, at 8:13 AM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr
mailto:fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
But if fibo is called through an invokedynamic, instead of emitting a
direct call to fibo,
the JIT generates a code that push the method handle on stack and
