How has this been working out? Eager to know if its helping.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
During the retrospective the team decided to trial a more extreme
approach to code review where we stop people from submitting new code
whilst there is
Max, what's your thought on this?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently we upped the radius for searches on Wikivoyage to 20km. This still
isn't probably enough for certain towns.
Is there anyway we can increase the maximum radius here (what is the
Does this mean mails sent to OTRS before this mail got lost?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Adam Baso ab...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The OTRS queues have been created and the Google Groups removed.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Yuvi Panda yuvipa...@gmail.com wrote:
As an update, I asked
Max Semenik, 27/03/2014 08:23:
Heh, we deployed the config change on the same day:)
For reference: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/119313/
Nemo
___
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Including more information on the UA, while being covered by legal under
the new privacy policy, really goes agains the wishes of the community as
they do not wish to be finger printed.
I don't think that the wishes of the community have been established and
the whole point of checkuser is
Actually my question is about further tweaking this... please reread my
email.
On 27 Mar 2014 02:02, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Max Semenik, 27/03/2014 08:23:
Heh, we deployed the config change on the same day:)
For reference: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/119313/
+1. I'm totally down for keeping less information around, but if it gets in
the way of people doing their job?
Rather than having an ethical debate over it, we could always test the
actual usefulness with Science. That way we'd be able to see how much
granularity each additional component adds to
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
So ideally I would include the tag @watchstar-setup in the 2 watchlist
tests. They would then run API requests to ensure the page is watched (or
run browser steps - is it possible to do that from in here)
I am not sure
Rather than having an ethical debate over it, we could always test the
actual usefulness with Science. That way we'd be able to see how much
granularity each additional component adds to the data.
I kind of feel we are going backwards as we throughly discussed this point,
technical info and
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually my question is about further tweaking this... please reread my
email.
D'oh!
So the problem is not in radius but in what to display.
https://wikimedia.mingle.thoughtworks.com/projects/mobile/cards/784discusses
how
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Arthur Richards
aricha...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Theoretically for every test run, a new browser profile is used so there
should not be issues with cookies (are we sure this is working correctly?).
For every test on Sauce Labs they start a clean virtual machine
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Okay thanks Chris - is there a bug we can track this?
Maybe this one:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60338
Željko
___
Mobile-l mailing list
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing lots of tests failing with too many connection resets (due
to Net::ReadTimeout - Net::ReadTimeout) after 2 requests on
70020846470700, last used 60.008243583 seconds ago
(Net::HTTP::Persistent::Error)
I think
I actually am talking to Cloudbees about this right now, but I don't have
high hopes for a resolution.
-C
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Željko Filipin zfili...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Okay thanks Chris - is there a bug
The VE tests are failing due to the longstanding cookie error. The
wikitext editor tests are failing on the I should not see the
wikitext editor overlay
The overlay takes time to disappear and the test doesn't keep this in
mind and just sees it and declares it having failed. Should we
introduce a
I already discussed the legal issues with Luis. The new implementation
should meet all our legal requirements.
Kaldari
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Arthur Richards
aricha...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Kaldari, do you need legal review for messaging at all?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:09 PM,
Sure but Željko says then I write a test, the first check that I
usually write is that the browser is at the correct page - this
sounds like he is suggesting this is not cruft I am wondering what
is the value in having this check? We have a step saying 'I am on Foo
bar page' which we assume
I'm not sure we'd want to bring in secondary points - I can imagine
the real use of Special:Nearby on Wikivoyage is for travellers who are
looking for places to go to next that are nearby e.g. by train/bus.
Somewhere like London would report Cambridge, Stonehenge or Oxford as
being nearby even
I imagine that if someone's in London they're much more likely to be
interested in finding a place to see or to eat at rather than to find a
next city for their trip. Unless all their touristic goals consist of
putting check marks near city names in a looong list:)
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:47
I'm saying there is use cases for both.
I would expect a site wide nearby feature to help me discover new
places nearby that I should visit (Wikivoyage even has a 'Go next'
section which does this)
When I'm in a place, on the page itself I would like to be able to see
map that helps me explore
Speaking in my capacity as both a long term volunteer checkuser (though not
currently because of my work requirements) a very active work related
owner/user of checkuser in the LCA team [probably the most active within
staff], and a strong advocate for saving as little info as possible I think
Note: I speak in this thread as a volunteer checkuser, not as the product
manager for platform. Not sending from my volunteer email address because I
don't want to subscribe to this list on two separate email addresses. :-)
The originally proposed spec (user agent to include device type and app
Chris seems to have answered this in this patch -
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/121543
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The VE tests are failing due to the longstanding cookie error. The
wikitext editor tests are failing on the I should not see the
So are their any technical limitations to experiment with both right now?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying there is use cases for both.
I would expect a site wide nearby feature to help me discover new
places nearby that I should visit
As Kenan pointed out during the last estimation meeting we have not
been keeping https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Mobile/Release_history up
to date.
How can we ensure we do a better job of this?
Should someone be responsible for it?
___
Mobile-l mailing
Kenan and I actually chatted a bit about this earlier today. Kenan's going
to take a first pass on the doc and we can review it as a team during our
quarterly planning session.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
As Kenan pointed out during the last
Installed on a Galaxy S3 and while i can search each link that i tap shows
'Could not reach network' on both wifi and mobile data.
--tomasz
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Yuvi Panda yuvipa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello! I'm going to start sending out notifications whenever an
Android app alpha
We introduced a pre-review hook in mobile that makes it hard for you
to submit new code when there is existing code to review (check out
[1] if you are interested)
The problem I find is it tells _me_ to do code review, but all the
patches belong to me so I can't review them. I can poke people and
They will be gone with Solr (or its schema, ro be precise).
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
So are their any technical limitations to experiment with both right now?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying
29 matches
Mail list logo
