oss
Linux distributions. Which is not a contradiction to what *you* said.
Hello!
I've Debian slink with 2.2.13 kernel, 2xPentium box, mod_perl 1.21 and
Apache 1.3.9
_ALL_ possible packages compiled as DSO. Apache uses DBD::Oracle,
Apache::DBI, Apache::ASP.
This machine is not a production server yet. But I
I don't think it was Apache's DSO support that was broken, I had httpd working
just fine with dynamic everything except mod_perl. mod_perl worked usually but
seg faulted with one obscure xs package. I think other similar problems have
been observed too.
In this case though I think the problem
On 8 Nov 1999, Greg Stark wrote:
In this case though I think the problem is that he's using the Red Hat binary
perl packages, which are known to be bogus. I'm not sure what Red Hat does to
their perl but it doesn't work right.
If we're using the Red Hat installed perl, what is the best way
Stas Bekman wrote:
Sure, compile static mod_perl. DSO is not stable.
Stas -
Not stable? Thats news to me and probably a lot of others who build DSO
modules for apache this way. OK, what is the best way to build it
statically?
Regards
--
Michael B. Weiner
Systems Administrator/Partner
I don't use DSO, may be someone who does can clear things out? Why there
are so many problems with DSO. The best answer I heard so far: "DSO isn't
stabilized yet." So I have just repeated it for you, Michael.
Come on, are we on a techical list or what? Anybody care/know to explain
when
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
As of Apache-1.3.9, Apache's DSO support really should be stable. I am
running a bunch of servers with the DSO version of the PHP module without
any problems.
-Rasmus
I am as well. I have 5 other redhat 6.1 servers running apache-1.3.9
with mod_ssl, mod_perl,
