Henrik Nyh <hen...@barsoom.se> wrote: > It was simply that monit did a "kill -6" (SIBABRT) when the process > used too much memory, so we bumped that limit for now. D'oh. We've yet > to research why it used that much memory.
Thanks for the followup. Unfortunately the RGenGC in Ruby 2.1.x uses more memory than 2.0 did (but GC is faster :). Sam wrote an article about it here: http://samsaffron.com/archive/2014/04/08/ruby-2-1-garbage-collection-ready-for-production We (ruby-core devs) will try to reduce memory for 2.2 without performance regressions. __ http://bogomips.org/unicorn-public/ - unicorn-pub...@bogomips.org please quote as little as necessary when replying
