All: This PR reflects discussions (so far) on PR 455 and PR 425.
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/540
It will continue to be updated as we work through the rest of the discussion
tomorrow.
I will be able to make the fixes as we go (I hope) through the rest of the PR
425 and 455
It seems like Martin covered all of the points I was going to mention. I’d
summarize by saying that I believe we’re following the rules as written. I also
believe that we’re giving the rules a bit of abuse here because of the volume
of changes coming in at the last minute.
That being said, I
Hi Rolf,
Comments inline marked with ">>"
Martin
--
Prof. Dr. Martin Schulz, Chair of Computer Architecture and Parallel Systems
Department of Informatics, TU-Munich, Boltzmannstraße 3, D-85748 Garching
Member of the Board of Directors at the Leibniz Supercomputing Centre (LRZ)
Email:
Dear Wesley and all,
Wesley, you did yesterday a wonderful job.
Please do not take the following items as any critism on your work.
they are only on procedural/general problems we may have.
1. Can it be that one No-No-vote can influence the outcome of the MPI
standard when the majority does
