I was going to ask for what your alias was, but I went and tried it myself. ls -l shows the same effect! On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:08:27PM -0500, Andy Spiegl wrote: > By the way you are also wrong about the proof of the 60 seconds. :-) > I had done this test not 5 months ago, but very recently. Only the > timestamp of the file is from February!
- timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Tony Godshall
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Luke Ross
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford