On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 09:03:55PM -0700, jc dill wrote:
p.s. Speaking of unreasonable requests - I feel it is unreasonable
for a member of the moderating committee to whine that he can't filter
out undesired posts due to using a lame email client, and to then
coerce a poster into
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
I'm aware of quite a few people who have encouraged said poster to tag his
off-topic posts for easy filtering, myself included.
A brief cite and quote from a news article discussing the status of
major networks (BellSouth Corp., SBC Communications, Cingular
--On September 26, 2005 8:59:31 AM +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/09/05, Michael Loftis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
result in me having to call postmaster to get them to remove it. Also
just one hacked webform usually results in the same problem (we have
On 26/09/05, Michael Loftis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realise this, but that's usually not the case. Almost without fail we
notice and shut it down long before aol starts blocking, and clear out the
queues of anything pending from the spammer. then hours or a day later AOL
blocks us for
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Michael Loftis wrote:
Also just one hacked webform usually results in the same problem (we
have thousands of web hosting customers). It's in our projects list to
find 'some way' to rate limit individual senders but it's not a high
priority right now.
I implemented rate
Please, can't we just solve this with a little sanity, and stop these back
and forth pissing match threads and off-topic posts?
I honestly believe that the issue of the TAGS is secondary and once
again this list is dragged into a long unrelated thread. I feel that
Paul got fed up with how
On 25-Sep-2005, at 23:36, Dennis Dayman wrote:
*cough*
http://puck.nether.net/netops/nocs.cgi?ispname=TDC
*cough*
Dang it... I forgot about that.
Just in case there's anybody here who has forgotten about it, the
NANOG list has a FAQ:
http://www.nanog.org/listfaq.html
which includes
On 26/09/2005, at 9:50 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
we just don't want this operational and technical mailing list for
network operations being taken
over by news and general technology chatter.
of please, there are far worse things this list is in danger of being
taken over by.
Hannigan, Martin wrote:
p.s. Speaking of unreasonable requests - I feel it is unreasonable
for a member of the moderating committee to whine that he
can't filter
out undesired posts due to using a lame email client, and to then
coerce a poster into tagging these posts.
There are no
We're looking for a method of actively monitoring certain
metrics on our network via software or a somewhat inexpensive hardware
solution (those metrics being which AS numbers are the highest
destinations for our network) and information like that which will help
us with capacity
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:37:00PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
We're looking for a method of actively monitoring certain
metrics on our network via software or a somewhat inexpensive hardware
solution (those metrics being which AS numbers are the highest
destinations for our network) and
Anyone at Bell Canada willing to email me offlist
Bell Canada BELLNEXXIA-11 (NET-67-68-0-0-1)
67.68.0.0 - 67.71.255.255
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
J. Oquendo
GPG Key ID 0x97B43D89
Good Afternoon,
I would like to request caution when cross posting between nanog@ and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please keep discussions related to future ideas for the list on
nanog-futures. If we decide to solicit opinions on ideas that come out of
the futures list, we will introduce a new thread on
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 11:42 -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:37:00PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
We're looking for a method of actively monitoring certain
metrics on our network via software or a somewhat inexpensive hardware
solution (those metrics being which AS
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:37:00PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
We're looking for a method of actively monitoring certain
metrics on our network via software or a somewhat inexpensive hardware
solution (those metrics being which AS numbers are the highest
destinations for our network)
On Sep 26, 2:37pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
8% of our traffic is destined to AS 2828 (XO communications) etc.
Shameless plug: BENTO does that.
http://www.networksignature.com
Most questions should be answered in the FAQ:
http://www.networksignature.com/bentofaq.html
Click 'take a test
Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Maybe we should do some statistical analysis and see who the
one person
who starts most of these pi??ing contests, as you call them, is? The
results may be interesting.
Maybe we should do some statistical analysis of the prolific off topic
posters and ego posters
I'm looking for a product or script that will let us generate a network map for
use in conjunction with Nagios. We have all of the parent/child dependencies
defined in a SQL table, as well as the current status, but I can only find
programs that will create a live map on my desktop. I also
On Sep 26, 2005, at 3:59 PM, Joe Johnson wrote:
I'm looking for a product or script that will let us generate a
network map for use in conjunction with Nagios. We have all of the
parent/child dependencies defined in a SQL table, as well as the
current status, but I can only find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a product or script that will let us generate
a network map for use in conjunction with Nagios. We have
all of the parent/child dependencies defined in a SQL table,
as well as the current status, but I can only find programs
that will create a live
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 somebody (attribution lost) said:
Maybe we should do some statistical analysis of the prolific off topic
posters and ego posters and line them up for taser hits in LAX?
Well, that just increased the odds that I'll be spotted at an IETF event
before I'm spotted at a
Anyone know of something that will generate an org-chart like
network map dynamically?
Intermapper http://www.intermapper.com/
Don't know where it breaks in terms of scale, but it is an interesting tool.
--
--chuck goolsbee
geek wrangler, digital.forest inc, seattle, wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Just trying to get some clarity and direction regarding obtaining
address space/ASN for my client.
Is there a minimum address space (?) an entity would need to justify to
go directly to RIR (ARIN in this case) as opposed to the upstream
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
Hi,
Just trying to get some clarity and direction regarding obtaining
address space/ASN for my client.
Is there a minimum address space (?) an entity would need to justify to
go directly to RIR (ARIN in this case) as opposed to the upstream
provider? Is
Depends how fancy you want it to be. You can get a static
map easily
using att's graphviz tools (dot):
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/
This may just work. I'll have to pass it on for it to be looked into.
Mainly, the problem is that the default Nagios network map is
Hi,
Just trying to get some clarity and direction regarding
obtaining address space/ASN for my client.
Is there a minimum address space (?) an entity would need to
justify to go directly to RIR (ARIN in this case) as opposed
to the upstream provider? Is /20 the minimum allocation?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 05:58:21PM -0500, Joe Johnson wrote:
I'm looking more for something that will let me create either a cascading
down tree format of the network, or as a drill-down map with major
components on the main screen and dependencies available by clicking on the
parent.
Here are the topics we've come up with so far for LA. Keep an eye on
www.nanog.org/mtg-0501/topics.html for additional talks as the meeting
draws nigh.
SUNDAY ACTIVITIES
-
- All-day Tutorial (9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.)
Getting Started with IPv6
Level:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
Just trying to get some clarity and direction regarding obtaining
address space/ASN for my client.
Is there a minimum address space (?) an entity would need to justify to
go directly to RIR (ARIN in this case) as opposed to the upstream
provider? Is /20
On Sep 26, 2005, at 8:27 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
I would recommend they register a maintainer, AS and appropriate route
objects in the RADB or one of the many IRR mirrors. Some carriers
build their filters based off of IRR data. That's still not a
guarantee of global routability,
I'd like to talk to you about a dns reachablity issue from our servers
trying to resolve a domain you host. Emailed you at your domain whois
contacts a while back but haven't got a reply yet
regards
-srs
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Here is the lists of candidates for the NANOG Program Committee.
First, the new people:
Dan Golding
Shankar Rao
Vish Yelsangikar
Guy Tal
Jennifer Rexford
David Conrad
Joel Jaeggli
Pete Templin
Christopher Quesada
Ren Provo
Richard Steenbergen
Todd
32 matches
Mail list logo
