[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:44:48 PDT, Sean Hafeez said:
I would be interested in find out what the average packet size people
are seeing on their backbones is at this point and time?
I predict that if you graph it, there's a ton of packets that are right
around the MTU
Our network also shows peaks at the ethernet MTU (our MTU is higher
than that) and the DNS packet size.
so who has been tracking packet size distributions for some years and
has published or could provide data?
randy
Hi folks,
The tentative agenda for NANOG44 will be released shortly and registration
will open for the October meeting. There are many time slots marked as
'speaker - pending' or 'tutorial - pending' due to abstracts lacking actual
presentations. We believe there are many good ideas lurking
As Valdis stated earlier:
I predict that if you graph it, there's a ton of packets that are right
around the MTU of the network. almost equal number of tiny packets carrying
the ACK's of the mobygrams, and then a small noise level of everything else.
That's pretty much the case for the last
Hello Everyone,
I am doing a research project on VoIP deployment feasibility for a
graduate degree. I am looking for people who have been involved with
Enterprise level VoIP deployments that would be willing to fill out a
short 10-15 question survey. Ideally I would like people who were involved
My apologies for not having my full name in the from field on the previous
email. I just set myself up a new account to catch Nanog messages and
forgot to set the name.
-Justin
Hello Everyone,
I am doing a research project on VoIP deployment feasibility for a
graduate degree. I am looking
Hello folks,
Is anybody aware of any papers with real-world data about IPv6 fragmentation?
I'd be interested in something along the lines of:
Shannon, C., Moore, D., and Claffy, K.C. 2001. Characteristics of
Fragmented IP Traffic on Internet Links.
(but that focuses on IPv6 fragmentation,
2.5K? No way. Get used or refurbished from Network Hardware or similar outlet.
We rarely buy new. Used gear works just fine.
--
Tim Sanderson, network administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:21
Or at least buy Cisco refurb and save $$$...;)
We have lots of 2950's in use ... moving to 2960's for low end
applications currently - then moving to 3560 etc from there
You might also checkout the Express500 stuff... more basic switch and
priced right.
Paul
-Original Message-
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:59:54PM -0400, Tim Sanderson wrote:
2.5K? No way. Get used or refurbished from Network Hardware or similar
outlet. We rarely buy new. Used gear works just fine.
Indeed. I just had to put my hands on my GBICs and a module for a
4200vl on short notice, and
Hello,
During the last years, there have been many discussions about the
scalability of the Internet architecture notably within the IRTF RRG.
With IPv6, thanks to its huge addressing space, it is possible to design
protocols and mechanisms that are more scalable and more powerful than
with
This is about what I would expect but as others haev noted does not
include jumbos.
This says that the majority of packets are session control and
open/close sequences on the one side and big, fat, WRED eligible data
packets on the other side.
This is consistant with the trends of youtube, high
12 matches
Mail list logo
