Fw: new message

2015-10-26 Thread Akyol Bora A
Hey! New message, please read <http://biodiversidadglobal.com/way.php?xw> Akyol Bora A

RE: The state-level attack on the SSL CA security model

2011-03-25 Thread Akyol, Bora A
What other choice does the public have? By locking them into the current trust model (for good or bad), the community has created this mess. Is it far fetched to supplement the existing system with a reputation based model such as PGP? I apologize if this was discussed before. -Original

RE: The state-level attack on the SSL CA security model

2011-03-25 Thread Akyol, Bora A
One could argue that you could try something like the facebook model (or facebook itself). I can see it coming. Facebook web of trust app ;-) -Original Message- From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 9:05 AM To: Akyol, Bora A Cc

RE: The state-level attack on the SSL CA security model

2011-03-25 Thread Akyol, Bora A
signed by CAs that are in the trust store of the web browser too. Just thinking out loud here. --- From: Dorn Hetzel [mailto:d...@hetzel.org] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 9:24 AM To: Akyol, Bora A Cc

Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course

2010-07-27 Thread Akyol, Bora A
Please see comments inline. On 7/22/10 10:13 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: In all reality: 1. NAT has nothing to do with security. Stateful inspection provides security, NAT just mangles addresses. Of course, the problem is that there are millions of customers that

Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course

2010-07-22 Thread Akyol, Bora A
As long as customers believe that having a NAT router/firewall in place is a security feature, I don't think anyone is going to get rid of the NAT box. In all reality, NAT boxes do work for 99% of customers out there. Bora On 7/22/10 7:34 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: Well,

RE: Vyatta as a BRAS

2010-07-19 Thread Akyol, Bora A
Except that the goal you set below is very very hard to do on a software router unless its CPU has packet classification properties implemented in HW. In some systems, just the act of receiving the packet in the ISR and classifying it into a bucket is enough to overwhelm the system without

RE: Future of WiMax

2010-06-18 Thread Akyol, Bora A
This is not exactly true. With the 3G networks (GSM) you can get. 7.2-Mbps HSDPA (downstream) 5.8-Mbps HSUPA (upstream) LTE speeds are much more comparable to Wimax. -Original Message- From: Holmes,David A [mailto:dhol...@mwdh2o.com] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:16 AM To: Seth

RE: Locations with no good Internet (was ISP in Johannesburg)

2010-03-01 Thread Akyol, Bora A
Michael I think for the people in the situation you are describing, the best bet would be one of the wireless technologies. Someone on the thread mentioned LTE (which should be coming out in a couple years time), and to that we can add WiMAX and even the 3G/3.5G HSPDA type wireless. The prices