On 9/14/2014 11:20 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sam Stickland s...@spacething.org wrote:
Slightly off topic, but has there ever been a proposed protocol where hosts
can register their L2/L3 binding with their connected switch (which could
then propagate the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Phil Bedard wrote:
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for
upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being
described as load
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Baldwin wrote:
While that would secure the connections from snooping if you're mailboxes
are on Office 365 and those mailbox stores do not exits on an encrypted LUN
then a service can easily read the Exchange database; anyone with server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
however, providers a/b at site1 do not send us the two /24s from
site b..
This is probably incorrect.
The providers are almost certainly sending you the prefixes, but your router
is dropping them due to loop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jun 10, 2013, at 13:36 , Bruce Pinsky b...@whack.org wrote:
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
however, providers a/b at site1 do not send us the two /24s from
site b..
This is probably incorrect.
The providers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -Hammer- wrote:
I'm sure that virtualizing the sup would be possible. But having to come up
with all the line cards would be a nightmare. I'd love for someone Internal
to tell me I'm wrong but until we can get a 3560 or a 3750X on Dynamips I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darrell Hyde wrote:
That might have something to do with the fact InterNAP bought both of
them (and the third company in that space).
I believe RouteScience was acquired by Avaya in 2004. Did Internap acquire
the IP after the fact?
Correct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jones, Barry wrote:
Hello all. I am looking at a variety of systems/methods to provide
(vendor, employee) access into my dmz's. I want to reduce the FW rule
sets and connections to as minimal as possible. And I want the accessing
party to only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glen Kent wrote:
Hi,
Apologies in advance since this is off-topic. However, posting in on
nanog since i am confident that we will have some experts who would be
able to guide me here.
I want to study the standards (RFC equivalent) for sending
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sam Stickland wrote:
| Even if they are decrementing TTL inside of their MPLS core, the TTL
| expired message still has to traverse the entire MPLS LSP (tunnel), so
| the latency reported for each hop is in fact the latency of the last
| hop in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Ferguson wrote:
No idea -- maybe just a hiccup?
No, the outage is real and affecting network and systems for internal and
external services.
- --
=
bep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using
11 matches
Mail list logo