If someone wants to assemble some of the freetserv boxes, I have some of the
PCBs and components here if you want them.
- Jared
> On Apr 26, 2024, at 1:27 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:
>
> If anyone is interested in https://freetserv.github.io/ but does not want to
> build one I have sort of
> On Apr 13, 2024, at 12:15 AM, 7ri...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>> I feel like this shouldn't be listed on a data sheet for just the whitebox
>> hardware. The software running on it would be the gating factor.
> There would be two things ... BGP convergence, and then the time required to
> get
ssue.
https://www.akamai.com/us/en/clientrep-lookup/
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
With all the $ being spent expanding fiber in the last mile, I’ve got a theory
that a lot of new and diverse fiber routes are being built between locations.
There’s a few places I know that roll up some of this information, but I’m
wondering if there’s anyone rolling this all up either publicly
to the point where auto-updates and many other things are
without trouble, sadly i had to do a bit of physical moving of things,
but the machine should now have a ~10g uplink and if I can find the
right 100g device that I'm happy with I'm in a better position to
update/upgrade it now compared to a
> On Feb 29, 2024, at 10:56 AM, Jay Acuna wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:22 AM Jared Mauch wrote:
>>
>
> Apparently some of the most important email lists, Outages, etc, are
> being kept online by 1 person's Unix/Linux server.
>
There’s other people wh
> On Feb 28, 2024, at 1:30 AM, Daniel Marks via NANOG wrote:
>
> We’re getting rocked by storms here in Michigan, could be related.
>
[ brief version of what happened from what I can tell reconstructing things]
I was alerted ~4am US/E yesterday about the issue. This machine has been
If you have a contact there can you please contact me off-list. Thanks.
- Jared
> On Aug 15, 2023, at 3:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> actually, i am amazed by the extent of "remote peering." if one
>> measures rtt to all the peers on the six, for example, the curve goes
>> out to well over 200ms. the six has seen remote peers from the gulf
>> states, and i do not mean
> On Aug 17, 2023, at 1:55 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
>
> I'm familiar with the island, it's it's puzzling that the major 3 cell
> carriers would accept a single point of failure like that, you would think
> they had microwave backup at minimum. Maybe it was a generator issue.
>
It’s common for
> On Aug 1, 2023, at 2:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> I have a wave transport vendor that suffered issues twice about ten days
> apart, causing my link to flap a bunch. I put in a ticket on the second set
> of occurrences. I was told that there was a card issue identified and would
> be
> On May 16, 2023, at 2:57 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>
> On 5/16/23 7:35 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG wrote:
>> +1 to what Josh writes below. I would also differentiate between mobile
>> networks (service provisioned to individual devices & often carrier s/w on
>> the device) and
I know when I did the openresolver project stuff I saw a number that would send glue or referrals from before they moved to the root servers domain names. - Jared Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Jun 2, 2023, at 8:49 AM, Nathan Ward wrote:
On 2/06/2023 at 10:22:46 AM, Wes Hardaker
> On May 11, 2023, at 11:11 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/11/23 15:50, Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote:
>
>> Hi Jared,
>> Could I make a conclusion from your comments: "only Carrier itself
>> understand the traffic - see many examples in the text".
>> I would very agree to this.
>
> On May 11, 2023, at 7:45 AM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG
> wrote:
>
> To clarify the table I linked to in the previous email:
>
> Cisco estimates IP traffic exchanged over the access network by both
> businesses and consumers with:
>
> • endpoints over managed networks and
> •
> On May 2, 2023, at 5:11 PM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote:
>
> I’ve seen proposals for an LSR MPLS/ROADAM type solution, where imagine you
> are at a hop where in a long distance system solution, you would end up with
> OEO, but instead you get directionality capability with an IP/MPLS
> On May 4, 2023, at 6:21 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/4/23 11:40, Denis Fondras wrote:
>
>>
>> You may also take into account the time to deliver.
>> Laying fiber takes much more time than plugging a colored optic.
>
> Indeed - part of the expense of running new fibre is the time
> On May 2, 2023, at 2:43 PM, Daniel Marks via NANOG wrote:
>
> This has been “resolved", I finally got through to some awesome engineer at
> Spectrum who has rerouted traffic while they work with their hardware vendor
> (thanks Jake):
One of the tools that I’ve used in the past is the
> On May 2, 2023, at 2:29 PM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 02:56:47PM -0600, Matt Erculiani wrote:
> > In short, the idea is that optical networks are wasteful and routers do a
> > better job making more use of a network's capacity than ROADMs.
I’ll help you off-list.
- Jared
> On Apr 27, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Matthew Crocker wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I run Crocker Communications (AS7849) and have ARIN allocations of
> 161.77.0.0/16 & 66.59.48.0/20. The 66.58.48.0/20 space was used for our
> datacenter which shutdown a couple
> On Apr 3, 2023, at 4:54 PM, Tony Wicks wrote:
>
> I have been using the QSFP-100G-CWDM4 2k optics for within rack/DC for a
> couple of years now. They are about the same price as SR optics but allow the
> use of simple duplex single mode patches without blasting 10K optics at each
>
FR1. They're available at a great price-point, and
> 2km reach is adequate for most applications.
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:25 AM Jared Mauch wrote:
> The common tech is 100G-LR4 these days - I'm wondering how many operators are
> supporting the LR1 to allow its use on 400
Can someone who is familiar with the fiber assets around the union square area
in SF ping me off-list?
Thanks.
- jared
The common tech is 100G-LR4 these days - I'm wondering how many operators are
supporting the LR1 to allow its use on 400G and future 800G optics as those use
breakout to support 100G ports.
Would you rather do a 400G port on a router vs 100LR1?
Curious what others think.
Sent via RFC1925
> On Jan 20, 2023, at 11:29 PM, Crist Clark wrote:
>
> Are you sure it’s really geolocation blocks? Or is it anonymizer and VPN
> service detection? The geoIP vendors typically sell both since one of
> anonymizers’ top applications is to evade geolocation. Have customers using
>
> On Jan 20, 2023, at 8:02 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> I will repeat what I have been saying since the first discussions of the
> concept of ip geo-location some decades ago…
>
> An IP address is not tied to any of the following:
> Location
> Person
>
> An IP address may be
I’ve been seeing an increasing problem with IP space not having the ability to
be used due to the behaviors of either geolocation or worse, people blocking IP
space after it’s been in-use for a period of time.
Before I go back to someone at ARIN and say “your shiny unused 4.10 IP space”
is
few flows.
- jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
imilar to x509watch on
*nix systems) would be appropriate.
I'm sure others can refer to tools or services that can do this,
but it's always a good idea to check your objects and watch when they go
away or expire.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger f
I've been waiting for some updates since September, there are good and
reputable geoIP services that accept updates and those that refuse to
acknowledge issues or have no way to update.
Some of the financial institutions and government agencies are examples of bad
consumers of them, but it's
> On Nov 15, 2022, at 2:09 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:55 PM, Eric Litvin wrote:
> A, Gbics:
>
> If you google ws-g5483, 84, 86, 87 - you’ll see the whole line up. All had sc
> connectors except 83 which was copper rj45 connector.
>
>
>
>
vices, you may end up with traffic blackholed or
other side-effects.
Simply put, SAV/BCP-38 et al is hard, and nearly impossible when
you get much further away from the subnet that traffic originates from.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.net
viders as
> well.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 5:35 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > Anyone figure this out? Have a new block that works with everything else
> > it seems but them and about to tell this customer to switch from their
> > service.
> >
> > Or if someo
tting in some kind of fall back
> > filter
> > in based on something like IRR data?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Charles Rumford (he/his/him)
> > Network Engineer | Deft
> > 1-312-268-9342 | charl...@deft.com
> > deft.com
> >
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Anyone figure this out? Have a new block that works with everything else it seems but them and about to tell this customer to switch from their service. Or if someone knows why 23.138.114.0/24 would be geolocated outside US/Michigan would be great to know. Thanks!Sent via RFC1925 compliant
Please ping me off list. Thanks.
Sent via RFC1925 compliant device
> On Sep 28, 2022, at 3:47 PM, Joshua Pool via NANOG wrote:
>
>
> Anyone have a contact for AKAMAI?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Josh
You can ping me off list. Thanks. Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Sep 26, 2022, at 1:39 PM, Dustin Brooks wrote:
Anyone having issues with sites hosted by Akamai? We have several users within a single /24 that are not able to access several (go.microsoft.com,
www.irs.gov, adobe.com,
I tried to place some new IP space under 4.10 ARIN into service and there's some Samsung thing that doesn't work now per customer reports so I moved people back out, so if there's someone who knows about that I'd also appreciate a ping. Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Sep 17, 2022, at 2:34 PM,
> On Aug 2, 2022, at 4:31 PM, John Levine via NANOG wrote:
>
> It appears that Michael Thomas via NANOG said:
>>
>> On 8/2/22 12:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via NANOG wrote:
>>> It's been doing it for ages for p=reject, but not p=none (the latter
>>> being Jared's situation)
>
> I don't
Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s problematic as if
one posts and does DMARC and has feedback on, our messages are possibly
rejected, and the feedback from a post is quite large.
Not sure who manages it anymore these days.
- Jared
> On Aug 2, 2022, at 11:58 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> This conventional interpretation is the one I'm applying in this question.
>
> I would argue even the 'conventional' definition of 'Tier 1' has been
> nebulous for long enough that it doesn't really matter much anymore.
>
> Who a
d
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *[image: uc%3fid=1CZG_hGEeUP_KD95fSHu2oBRA_6dkOo6n]*
> >
> > *Jawaid Bazyar*
> >
> > Chief Technical Officer
> >
> > VERO Broadband
> >
> > [image: signature_3735065359]
> >
> > 303-815-1814
> >
> > [image: signature_3363732610]
> >
> > jbaz...@verobroadband.com
> >
> > [image: signature_60923]
> >
> > https://verobroadband.com
> >
> > [image: signature_4057438942]
> >
> > 2347 Curtis St, Denver, CO 80205
> >
> >
> >
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
You always want to prefer customer routes over non customer routes as a service
provider. Of course having a robust set of communities to let adjustments
happen helps.
Without proper tiering of routes you may see unstable routing.
Having a standard set of customer, peer, transit set of local
> On Jul 11, 2022, at 11:15 AM, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>
> This is the most they can and will say. For liabilities reasons, specifics
> are likely not in the cards. As most services ride over common service
> networks, its quite possible that a network substrate failure can have a
>
I can confirm that the hardware that NANOG does use can't filter it all
automatically I think for v6 as I helped them look at it.
Sent via RFC1925 compliant device
> On Jul 10, 2022, at 5:22 PM, Matthew Luckie wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I just realized that many automatically put emails with the
Yeah the big thing I’ve seen is that companies have historically over claimed
on their 477 reports in weird and interesting ways. I understand why and how
it happens, for example, if we do a HH meet for service at location X in census
tract 2020-01 and I have a 2 mile loop to location Y in
> On Jun 14, 2022, at 12:42 PM, Shawn L via NANOG wrote:
>
> With the current shortages and lead times, I almost feel like I did back in
> the beginning of my career ---
>
> Then it was "what can we do with what we can afford" now it's more like
> "What can we do with what we have (or
This seems to be missing some of the reasons/why things are remarked, perhaps
it would be wise to bring some of the people interested in this to the various
vendor-specific lists or such?
For example, for some hardware types, enabling any sort of rate shaping at all
will rewrite the DSCP
> On Jun 13, 2022, at 10:25 AM, Brielle wrote:
>
> I quickly reconfigured the Cys WireGuard node to connect to the Den node over
> IPv6 and, after WireGuard did its magic dynamically reconfiguring endpoints,
> suddenly the connection was back up and routing at full speed. Hell yeah!
>
>
Yes, XG-PON.
>
> Most FTTH operator stories I've heard of are still running regular GPON,
> thought.
>
> Seems XG-PON has a high barrier-to-entry for el-cheapo home consumers.
You would be surprised. The equipment isn't that expensive in
the grand scheme of things.
passing them
but can't get service.
Not everyone is that lucky, but I've seen places with 2-3 fiber
providers that pass them and none offer service.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
> On May 31, 2022, at 8:41 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG
> wrote:
>
> All the large DOCSIS networks of which I am aware are in fact working on
> changing their spectrum plan and physical layer to enable higher US speeds
> and in some cases symmetric multi-gig services.
Yes, I’ve seen
Sadly thus us repeating the same problematic data based on average usage by
older Americans vs usage by younger people or those of us with several
children.
I agree with the average utilization but when it comes to those peaks my
customers can finish their uploads or restores quickly when
> On May 26, 2022, at 9:31 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG
> wrote:
>
>> Latency is a limitation for things that are generally relatively low
>> bandwidth (interactive audio, zoom, etc.).
>> Higher bandwidth won’t solve the latency problem
>
> +1
> IMO as we enter the 'post-gigabit era', an
it's hosted, and it was a bit amusing when I left
NTT that he gave me grief about the as2914.net domain registration ...
I would love to see it updated, even if it's not from the 2914
vantage point, i think he left some docs about how it was done.
- jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp k
t; manipulate PIM assert winner in Cisco boxes though. Highest IP is the
> winner if IGP costs are the same to the source.
>
> R
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:02 AM Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > If this is ASM, what device is the RP? You may want to configure MSDP
>
If this is ASM, what device is the RP? You may want to configure MSDP between
PE1/PE2 to help if that’s the case, or is this SSM or something else you may
want to just flip the PIM priority to make it pick what you want and see if you
can tie it to your HSRP (Cisco, might I suggest VRRP so you
Yup.. ping me with the details off-list
- Jared
> On Mar 2, 2022, at 7:02 PM, Christopher Munz-Michielin
> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> Hoping someone has a contact at Akamai who can assist.
>
> As part of my day job I run a DNS network and we've been having issues with
> Akamai mis-locating
> On Jan 13, 2022, at 12:28 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Brandon Martin said:
>> AT and Comcast don't seem to provide battery by default if you buy
>> voice service from them.
>
> The only major power outage I've experienced at my house (I've been here
> over 20 years) was
> On Jan 3, 2022, at 2:53 PM, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
>
> Hi Allen,
>
> Yes, it can be this quiet. It’s good news, it means the thing is mostly
> working :-)
>
> I wish everyone a happy and calm 2022!
>
I’m surprised nobody talked about the major provider outages that happened over
> On Dec 13, 2021, at 2:24 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> The bigger problem seems to be the ever growing list of products you may be
> using which depend on it potentially without your knowledge.
This isn’t a new problem.
This is an great modern example showing how deeply embedded things
This is largely a patching exercise for people that use the software. If you
use it, please patch.
Sent via RFC1925 complaint device
> On Dec 10, 2021, at 10:59 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
> The intricacies of Java are over my head, but I’ve been reading about this
> Log4j issue that
> On Dec 5, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>
> On 01.12.21 15:17, Tom Beecher wrote:
>> While you are correct that it's just as illegal to intentionally interfere
>> with the unlicensed wifi bands as it is with CBRS, the difference is that
>> the FCC and regulatory bodies are much
side OS will still be a variable that is difficult to digest. Not sure
how many people are running very old IP stacks. This is another hard to
measure problem.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
> On Nov 18, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> as a measurement kinda person, i wonder if anyone has looked at how much
> progress has been made on getting hard coded dependencies on D, E, 127,
> ... out of the firmware in all networked devices.
At least the E space is largely usable
ave IPv6 on the authorities and
should work without issues.
eg:
dig -6 +trace www.akamai.com.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
This is quite common to tie an underlying service announcement to BGP
announcements in an Anycast or similar environment. It doesn’t have to be
externally visible like this event for that to be the case.
I would say more like Application availability caused the BGP routes to be
withdrawn.
> On Oct 5, 2021, at 10:05 AM, Karl Auer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 08:50 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> A few reminders for people:
>> [excellent list snipped]
>
> I'd add one "soft" list item:
>
> - in your emergency plan, have one or
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 4:53 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
> How come such a large operation does not have an out of bound access in case
> of emergencies ???
>
>
I mentioned to someone yesterday that most OOB systems _are_ the internet. It
doesn’t always seem like you need things like modems
I mostly agree with this. Even new hardware like eero doesn't do v6 by default.
It's just off. So many things are like this. It's nice that LTE and other
deployments have v6 by default. Last time I knew providers like t mobile are
great but their MVNOs like Ultra Mobile do not do v6.
All this
> On Sep 16, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Ca By wrote:
>
>
>
>
> This has nothing to do with IPv6, of course, other than that modern phones use
> VoLTE so within a mobile carrier's network your voice call is probably handled
> using IPv6 transport.
>
> Good point John.
>
> A lot of folks missed
> On Sep 9, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> to control inbound traffic, how do bgp optimizers decide how to tune
> what they announce? slfow? exploration? ouija board?
>
> randy
Generally via sFlow or other traffic detail models.
- Jared
Hello,
I’m looking for someone at 9500 that can look into why you started announcing
some IP space starting on August 25th intermittently that is causing an
operational network issue.
Can you please contact me off-list?
Thanks
- jared
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 10:04 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> You need to make these things fool-proof. We haven't traveled in over a year
> but the day we do, it's a recipe for disaster if the person that deals with
> this stuff is on the road when the power goes out back at home.
This is why I
> On Aug 18, 2021, at 9:38 AM, John Kristoff wrote:
>
> Maybe because there isn't a simple, universal approach to setting it.
> Probably like a lot of people, historically I'd set it to
> some % over the current stable count and then manually adjust when the
> limits were about to be
Hello,
Akamai has been increasing the routes we are advertising in various locations
as part of ongoing network changes. If you have a max-prefix set for Akamai
can you please increase v4 to 1k and ensure you are accepting our additional
ASNs that may live behind the clusters.
We are going
Work hat is not on, but context is included from prior workplaces etc.
> On Jul 25, 2021, at 2:22 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> It doesn't seem like a tenable solution, when the solution is 'do
> better', since I'm sure whoever did those checks did their best in the
> first place. So we must assume
> On Jul 22, 2021, at 12:56 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
> The outage appears to have, ironically, taken out the outages and
> outages-discussion lists too.
>
> Kinda like having a fire at the 911 dispatch center…
Should not have impacted me in my hosting of the list. Obviously if the
I looked at this before and go far enough in the conversations with one carrier
that had sold this as a product before and had a poor experience with the
customers they were no longer offering it. You are likely better off getting a
volume deal on waves, which can be had for pretty cheap these
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 1:50 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 20:19, Graham Johnston
> wrote:
>
>> I don't at this point have long term data collection compiled for the issues
>> that we've faced. That said, we have two 100G transport links that have a
>> regular background
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 9:04 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
>
> On 7/19/21 5:41 AM, Feldman, Mark wrote:
>> What you propose is not outlandish; some ISPs have been dual stack
>> and providing some combination of these services for years. They
>> already provide IPv6 ip6.arpa delegations should
I know that many operators shift traffic based on network and internet quality
(or don’t use certain networks at all). This is a great chance to share
information about things operators have experienced or do to actively measure
or otherwise to inform those decisions.
- snip -
For complete
> On Jun 2, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, May 31, 2021 Mike Hammett wrote:
Muni broadband does suck, but that's another thread for another day.
>>> Excluding cases where muni broadband doesn't suck, why does muni broadband
>>> suck?
>>>
>>> Personally I
I've had a similar issue in the past trying to get ready to peer with them. I
wanted portal access to look at things. I may yet post a geofeed file just
because.
(I was also rejected a portal account, didn't escalate to friends at google
because I know my traffic is under a gig for now).
-
or a day a month of thsi big traffic,
but when one of their customers has issues they immediately escalate to
us to ask us to move (and we try hard to do that).
It's not all throw bandwidth at the problem, but with 100g optics being
so cheap these days, it may be the lower bar
- jared
--
e end-user induced
demand and stress it places on networks doesn't fit into the historical
95/5 30-day peak planning model. I know some carriers are struggling to
adjust. There's a few of us here on-list, please reach out so we can
help.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
> On Apr 1, 2021, at 11:15 AM, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
>
> Peace,
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021, 6:09 PM wrote:
> That was a lot of traffic coming out of akamai aanp clusters the last couple
> nights! What was it?
>
> "Call of Duty" update again, obviously.
>
>
and maybe 2k is using some metadata like that to
> block our IPs.
>
> Does anyone have a contact at Prolexic who might be able to help?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim Nowaczyk
>
> --
> Timothy Nowaczyk | Senior Network Manager
> office 703.554.6622 | mobile 571.318
overheat and shutdown is short enough you can't really get a tech to
the cage in time to prevent it.
I assume also the latter above, which is people have varying
definitons of clean.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://p
The he.net side is interesting as you can see who their v4 transits are but
they suppress their routes via v6, but (last I knew) lacked community support
for their customers to do similar route suppression.
I’m not a fan of it, but it makes the commercial discussions much easier each
time
I was thinking about how we need a war stories nanog track. My favorite was
being on call when the router was stolen.
Sent from my TI-99/4a
> On Feb 16, 2021, at 2:40 PM, John Kristoff wrote:
>
> Friends,
>
> I'd like to start a thread about the most famous and widespread Internet
>
> On Feb 16, 2021, at 8:25 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> It's cheaper to build 2x, 3x, 4x the aerial plant than to build 1x the
> underground plant.
>
> The actual cost per foot is more like 10x difference, but there are right of
> way, maintenance, etc. costs to factor in as well.
>
Labor
Almost exactly 4 years ago we were out up here in Michigan for over 120 hours
after a wind storm took out power to 1 million homes. Large scale restoration
takes time. When the load and supply are imbalanced it can make things worse as
well.
I'm hoping things return to normal soon but also am
I’m expecting many people to move out to 165 Halsey but as with many things the
future is still hazy. I also wonder if at some point Google will decide that
WFH is viable and they don’t need the office space in 111 8th and things will
swing back..
(Yes, I know that 165 isn’t in NY)
- Jared
I’ve closed the form for responses.
There were 102 people who self-selected to participate.
Around 25% of you have this configured as a default in your network.
At 20940 we are asking our networking partners to configure this facing us such
that we can receive the routes from some of the
I’m curious how many networks have this as part of their default configuration?
If you’re bored on a weekend please click through to this and say yes/no. I’ll
summarize in a week or so. If I configured the form right, it should also show
you the results as well.
> On Dec 26, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG
> wrote:
>
> Here the "truth" is that if you game, you need to have a wired connection to
> your gaming computer. All gamers "know" this.
My sons switch is hard wired, he gets considerable advantage (apparently) due
to using the
> On Dec 25, 2020, at 5:32 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> I agree it is odd to make 100/100 the top speed. The fiber service I
> have from my local non-Bell telco offers 100/100, 500/500, and
> 1000/1000. FiOS where you can get it goes to 940/880.
>
> The obvious guess is that their upstream
> On Dec 25, 2020, at 12:48 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
>
> 10g to the home is a great idea to think about, it's just not terribly
> practical for most customers unless they want to drop 1-2k on routing gear and
> nics. This is always changing, but it's going to be a few years until we
> reach
Matthew,
I haven’t seen this problem in a long time where someone else submits data to
cause the out-of-zone glue to appear. It’s possible there’s something
happening at NETSOL that is causing this, but the best way is for you to go
into your registrar and ensure they’re publishing the proper
1 - 100 of 1207 matches
Mail list logo
