Git prefixes blobs with its own data. You're not going to break git with a
SHA-1 binary collision. However, svn is very vulnerable to breaking.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:11 PM, J. Hellenthal
wrote:
> It's actually pretty serious in Git and the banking markets where there
If you have a peering session with Google or one of their cache boxes, you
can set a GeoIP publishing endpoint using their online portal at
isp.google.com. That's only for Google though.
-richard
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:19 AM, David Sotnick
wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> I
This behavior is never defensible nor acceptable.
In addition to being in the wrong with BGP hijacking a prefix, it
appears that Mr. Townsend had the wrong target, too. We've been
attacked a few dozen times by this botnet, and they could never muster
anything near 200 gbps worth of traffic. They
If you have peering relationship with Google, you can use the isp.google.com
portal to self-publish geo information on your netblocks. At least you can
in theory. By their own admission, they have never checked the
self-published URL that I configured over a month ago.
YMMV.
-richard
On Thu,
Purposefully hosting an "inflammatory" site that the Russians or Chinese
object to is a valid way to get your AS null routed inside those countries.
Same goes for Turkey, India, Australia...
Solves the DDoS and malware problem inside their borders, not yours.
On Dec 25, 2015 4:43 AM, "Max Tulyev"
We've tried their products off an on for the past 3-4 years. Here are
my impressions:
* UI stuck in 1999. Can't click zoom, drill down, etc.
* Inflexible UI. Want a bandwidth graph with only egress or ingress? Too bad.
* Inexpensive. I don't like that it's licensed yearly, but it's not
too much
I've found the best method of dealing with vendors like this is to treat
them the same way they treat you. If they won't listen to technical
arguments and act like stubborn children, then I act the same way. Threaten
to take your ball and go home. Or buy everything used or from grey market
I'll wholeheartedly endorse Noction's IRP. It works really well, and
Noction is very quick to respond to both bugs and feature requests.
-richard
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:14 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't used it and have no experiance with it, I've simply seen it
The updated CentOS openssl binaries haven't patched the underlying bug, but
they have disabled the heartbeat functionality. By doing so, they've
disabled the attack vector. Once upstream releases a fix, they will
re-enable the heartbeat function with the working patch.
And yes, don't forget to
We're really pleased with the Perle IOLAN line. They even have a gigabit
port without a $10k price tag. Amazing!
It really dumbfounds me why so many vendors are still putting 10/100
Ethernet ports on their OOB management (looking at you OpenGear).
Especially a PITA today since many switchports
Probably not a bug, but par for their technical prowess. The SpamTeq
website includes your account number and password in every URI. I'm not
sure I'd trust a company that does something as terrible as that to
practice good coding elsewhere and not cause major damage with their data
feeds.
We're also interested in using their BGP feeds, but their website (
spamhaustech.com) doesn't give much confidence about their technical
prowess. Trying to get a simple quote for BGP feeds is...interesting.
-richard
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:25 AM, ISP Services na...@isp-services.nl wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:57 PM, ML m...@kenweb.org wrote:
Kudos to whomever made this happen so quickly
+1 on that. Great stuff in here. Though the Better Than Best
Practices...DNS Amplification Attacks video isn't working for me. It says
the video is still processing and has been for a few
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
I would add:
- response you can expect when you call one day and say our 10GE is
maxed out with inbound traffic from apparently everywhere, it has been
going on for an hour, please help
That was good for a laugh.
If
Can someone from Comcast please contact me over what appears to be an
ill-conceived nullroute or block regarding one of our content IP's.
This issue is limited only to Comcast and only to a single IP. Please
contact me to get this resolved. I'm guessing that someone wanted us
offline but couldn't
Several people responded to me off list. Thanks!
-richard
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Richard Hesse richard.he...@weebly.comwrote:
Can someone from Comcast please contact me over what appears to be an
ill-conceived nullroute or block regarding one of our content IP's.
This issue
16 matches
Mail list logo