RE: two interfaces one subnet

2009-05-11 Thread chris.ranch
Hi Chris, I remember this. I remember it in an early IP RFC, but couldn't find it in 10 minutes of searching. It had to do with intefaces cannot have overlapping address space. One of the IETF greybeards ought to know. It's been a while since I was writing code with marked up rfc's in

RE: Fiber cut in SF area

2009-04-13 Thread chris.ranch
Peter Beckman [mailto:beck...@angryox.com] wrote: Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 11:19 AM To: Dylan Ebner Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Fiber cut in SF area On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Dylan Ebner wrote: It will be easier to get more divergence than secure all the manholes in the country. I still

RE: Fiber cut in SF area

2009-04-13 Thread chris.ranch
Hi Peter, You wrote: So, let's see. I'm pulling numbers out of my butt here, snip Total cost...is about $3000 per mile for equipment snip It could run on an overhead monorail snip Network it all snip Confickr-type domains to make sure I get the feeling you haven't deployed or

RE: microsoft please contact me off list

2009-03-12 Thread chris.ranch
More likely spoofed sources. Good luck. -Original Message- From: ext Charles Wyble [mailto:char...@thewybles.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:40 PM To: Thomas P. Galla Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: microsoft please contact me off list You are getting dossed from a Microsoft

RE: Redundant Array of Inexpensive ISP's?

2009-03-11 Thread chris.ranch
Yes and no. Yes, in that it does best path selection, no in that it does not use BGP, since low cost assumes DSL or cable, over which I've never seen BGP deployed. This class of device assumes an appliance at each end. Performance data is collected, compression and load balancing techniques