Re: Spectrum technical contact

2018-12-21 Thread nop
Is this the right Spectrum? There's one that's aka Wave and are pretty good and incredibly responsive to abuse reports, and then there's Spectrum Cable/Charter, which is on par with residential Comcast service. On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, at 2:01 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: >

Re: Facebook doesn't have a route to my ISP's (Cogeco) IPv6 space?

2018-12-20 Thread nop
Cogeco is not related to Cogent On Thu, Dec 20, 2018, at 0:0.366 AM, David Guo via NANOG写: > It's problem from Cogentco, they do not have IPv6 peer with HE.net and Google

Re: Google Captcha

2018-09-14 Thread nop
- Not being signed in to a Google account with a verified phone number - Searching complex things that look like dorks ("powered by vbulletin", "xxx v0.0.1", etc), can trigger within a page or two sometimes - Does this end user lease any IPs from brokers or otherwise? - on extremely, very,

Re: Avast / Privax abuse contact

2018-08-01 Thread nop
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Matt Harris wrote: > Anybody know anyone at or anything about Privax or Avast? AS 198605 is > announcing the problem networks. Chances are slim you'll get a useful response. Crappy "HIDE YOUR ACTIVITY TORRENT FREELY" VPN provider that has a TON of abusive

Re: Blizzard, Battle.net connectivity issues

2018-07-18 Thread nop
Out of curiosity, are you using one of those cheap dirty "misused outside of region" Afrinic blocks? They keep trying (and spamming the crap out of a few forums) to offload them to ISPs temporarily for cheap so that the ISPs will get them cleaned up and marked as residential, then

Re: Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 public DNS broken w/ AT CPE

2018-04-02 Thread nop
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 8:35 AM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > quad-digit IP. They must have known that this would cause routing issues, and > now suddenly it's our responsibility to make significant changes to live > infrastructures just so they can continue to look clever with the IP address. In this

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

2018-03-31 Thread nop
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Very disappointing to see a popular prefix being allocated/reseved for > research then being allocated to a company without public consultation. I > am sure APNIC community will ask APNIC Sr. management for an explanation. > > This prefix ,

Re: Proof of ownership; when someone demands you remove a prefix

2018-03-12 Thread nop
I've seen this type of situation come up more than a few times with the shadier IP brokers that lease and don't care who they lease to, for example Logicweb, Cloudinnovation ( see bgp.he.net/search?search[search]=cloudinnovation+OR+%22cloud+innovation%22 ), Digital Energy-host1plus. The ranges