Please relay to your CCIE/JNCIE friends, I am giving out
name@theccie.comand n...@jncie.com email accounts, anyone interested
can contact me.
but who would want to deal with such slime?
Sorry, ARIN's been keeping me busy
since the NANOG wrap-up, but finally
took some time after the social tonight
to finish posting all the rest of my notes,
minus the IP Reputation notes, to
http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/NANOG59
Another awesome NANOG, one of the
best ones in a while; thanks
Access to Baghdad(Iraq) via internet is not possible. Anyone seeing the
same thing ?
Regards
-Ray L.
Seriously... Those cert monkeys think they know everything ;)
Stefan Fouant
JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ENT, JNCI
m (703) 625-6243
On Oct 11, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Please relay to your CCIE/JNCIE friends, I am giving out
name@theccie.comand n...@jncie.com email
Hi,
They did, unfortunately I've been having one busy week. I should get around
to pinging the person who replied to me today, and thank you if that person
reads this email and to you as well. It's much appreciated.
Thanks,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Paul Rolland r...@witbe.net wrote:
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for
upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being
described as load balancing where end-user traffic is assigned to a
line according to source
On Oct 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk wrote:
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for
upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being
described as
On Oct 12, 2013, at 12:27 AM, William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk wrote:
But I'm having a distinct lack of success locating rants and diatribes or
even well-reasoned articles supporting this opinion.
Possibly because it's so commonly known that PBR is generally a Very Bad Idea
for the
On Oct 11, 2013, at 10:27 AM, William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk wrote:
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for
upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being
described as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11/10/2013 19:41, joel jaeggli a écrit :
On Oct 11, 2013, at 10:27 AM, William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk
wrote:
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:27:00 +0100 (BST)
William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk wrote:
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for
upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:41:46 -0700, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com said:
you take all the useful information that an IGP could be (or is)
providing you, and then you ignore it and do something else.
Yes, that's another part of the conversation, encouraging the use of
an IGP, which has
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, Jared Mauch wrote:
I think this all depends on how it's configured, and if you can monitor/detect
failures.
I've seen folks do things like this with a Linux box with multiple
routing tables. If you have something validate the link is working,
you can easily have it
Most if not all IGPs can be configured to work without multicast. Now if
you're talking IPv6 you may have some issuesŠ
On 10/11/13 2:13 PM, William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:41:46 -0700, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com said:
you take all the useful
- Original Message -
From: joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com
you take all the useful information that an IGP could be (or is)
providing you, and then you ignore it and do something else.
Well, I tell you what.
My perception of where this was a good idea is the use case a recent
client
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:13 PM, William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:41:46 -0700, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com said:
evil is not a synonym for ugly patch placed over a problem that
could be handled better.
Ok, fair enough. My first experience with
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
I think they are referring to something like Cisco PBR, where you
configure routing policy statically on each hop. Yes, it can be
configured to fail over, etc, but inherently it is a management nightmare
if you are configuring PBR on each device in your network. May as well
move back to static
What is SDN at its essence ?
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:13:57 +0100 (BST)
From: William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk
To: joe...@bogus.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss.
Message-ID: 20131011.191357.239591912.wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk
Centralized management / control plane. Kind of the reverse of widely
dispersed per-node policy based routing.
On 10/11/13 2:47 PM, Vytautas V Grigaliunas v...@fnal.gov wrote:
What is SDN at its essence ?
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:13:57 +0100 (BST)
From: William Waites
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
but who would want to deal with such slime?
I dunno, it looks pretty legit to me!!
Domain Name.. theccie.com
Creation Date 2013-09-28
Registration Date 2013-09-28
Expiry Date.. 2014-09-28
Hey,
No offense but this could potentially look like a phishing expedition to
some people. I'm saying this regardless of whether you are legit or not, I
did not do much research and am only giving you my honest impression.
Just saying, anyone could purchase a domain name and say they want to
On Oct 11, 2013, at 12:27 PM, William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.uk wrote:
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for
upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being
described as
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 12:45 -0700, Scott Howard wrote:
I dunno, it looks pretty legit to me!!
Domain Name.. theccie.com
Creation Date 2013-09-28
Registration Date 2013-09-28
Expiry Date.. 2014-09-28
Organisation Name the ccie
Organisation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
We use Linux for our edge routers which have multiple interfaces to
different BGP peers. Policy based routing allows us to insure that
traffic originating from a particular external IP address on the router,
goes out the matching network.
This report has been generated at Fri Oct 11 21:15:04 2013 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 03-Oct-13 -to- 10-Oct-13 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS36998 62516 3.0% 48.1 -- SDN-MOBITEL
2 - AS982940360 1.9% 23.7 --
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:27 PM, William Waites wwai...@tardis.ed.ac.ukwrote:
In my opinion the main problems with this are:
- It's brittle, when a line fails, traffic doesn't re-route
Yes, but this is no worse than if you just had one single DSL link.
Manual failover is a perfectly valid
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for
upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being
described as load balancing where end-user traffic is assigned to a
line according to source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Phil Bedard wrote:
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for
upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being
described as load
Hey, I'm a security guy, I'm paid to be paranoid, the only question is
whether I'm paranoid enough .. I don't need another EMail addy
Gary Baribault
Courriel: g...@baribault.net
GPG Key: 0x685430d1
Fingerprint: 9E4D 1B7C CB9F 9239 11D9 71C3 6C35 C6B7 6854 30D1
On 10/11/2013 04:51 PM, Richard
I'd hope that an IE would get this email for a vanity address on some
blog.. I would hope..
On 10/11/13 4:07 PM, Gary Baribault g...@baribault.net wrote:
Hey, I'm a security guy, I'm paid to be paranoid, the only question is
whether I'm paranoid enough .. I don't need another EMail addy
Gary
I think I'll look to one up him and register theccar.com
On Oct 11, 2013, at 18:09, Gary Baribault g...@baribault.net wrote:
Hey, I'm a security guy, I'm paid to be paranoid, the only question is
whether I'm paranoid enough .. I don't need another EMail addy
Gary Baribault
Courriel:
On 10/11/2013 7:07 PM, Gary Baribault wrote:
Hey, I'm a security guy, I'm paid to be paranoid, the only question is
whether I'm paranoid enough .. I don't need another EMail addy
Gary Baribault
Courriel: g...@baribault.net
GPG Key: 0x685430d1
Fingerprint: 9E4D 1B7C CB9F 9239 11D9 71C3 6C35
Well in case you wondering how much the domain costs me, it costs me 1.99
for 1 year :-)
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 7:26 AM, ML m...@kenweb.org wrote:
On 10/11/2013 7:07 PM, Gary Baribault wrote:
Hey, I'm a security guy, I'm paid to be paranoid, the only question is
whether I'm paranoid enough
Really appreciated this video! Tracking amplification on Comcast as we
speak!
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.sewrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013, Niels Bakker wrote:
* d...@temk.in (David Temkin) [Tue 08 Oct 2013, 23:43 CEST]:
We're proud to announce that all
As others have pointed out, PBR ...
* Is a fragile configuration. You're typically forcing next-hop without
a [direct] failover option,
* Often incurs a penalty (hardware cycles, conflicting feature sets, or
outright punting to software),
* Doesn't naturally load-balance (you pick the source
37 matches
Mail list logo
