On Friday, February 14, 2014 03:01:27 AM Jared Mauch wrote:
I would actually like to ask for those folks to un-block
NTP so there is proper data on the number of hosts for
those researching this. The right thing to do is
reconfigure them. I've seen a good trend line in NTP
servers being
On Feb 14, 2014, at 00:44 , Antonio Querubin t...@lavanauts.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Warren Bailey wrote:
There is a group called PTC.. Pacific Telecommunications Council.. That¹s
pretty much the biggest I can think of (lot¹s of MSO¹s.. Operators, etc.)
and it¹s in Hawaii every year.
On Feb 14, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
the survey questions are highly biased toward arin's view of itself.
just one example. you ask how well arin serves it's members and
customers. you do not ask how well it serves the internet community,
the internet, or society in
Gentlemen! Cease this infernal internal bickering! If we do not make common
cause against the one true enemy, the User, all is lost! ...
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com
Sent from Kangphone
On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:15 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Feb 13,
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
Hi,
I've been trying contacting Yahoo Email support in Europe through the
web support page in vain. Apparently they are all busy in moving their
EMEA HQ... :)
If there's anyone from Yahoo Mail that read this list that can contact
me off-list I'd be grateful.
Thank you in advance.
- leonardo
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 08:01:27PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
I would actually like to ask for those folks to un-block NTP so there is
proper data on the number of hosts for those researching this. The right
thing to do is reconfigure them. I've seen a good trend line in NTP servers
being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2/14/2014 10:22 AM, Wayne E Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 08:01:27PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
I would actually like to ask for those folks to un-block NTP so
there is proper data on the number of hosts for those researching
this.
On 02/13/2014 06:01 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:47 PM, John jsch...@flowtools.net wrote:
snip
UDP won't be blocked. There are some vendors that have their own hidden
protocol inside UDP packets to control and communicate with their devices.
Thinking on it again, maybe
This report has been generated at Fri Feb 14 21:13:40 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
BGP Update Report
Interval: 06-Feb-14 -to- 13-Feb-14 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS731578341 3.0%1135.4 -- COLOMBIA TELECOMUNICACIONES
S.A. ESP
2 - AS9829
On 2/14/2014 12:42 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Taken to the logical extreme, the right thing to do is to deny any
spoofed traffic from abusing these services altogether.
Since the 1990s I have argued (ineffectively, it turns out) a case that
says that sentence can be edited down to good
I was being a bit extreme, I don't expect UDP to be blocked and there are
valid uses for NTP and it needs to pass. Can you imagine the trading
servers not having access to NTP?
Sure.
They could setup internal NTP servers listening to GPS. Would it be as good
overall as using external
On 2/14/14, 3:00 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
I was being a bit extreme, I don't expect UDP to be blocked and there are
valid uses for NTP and it needs to pass. Can you imagine the trading
servers not having access to NTP?
Sure.
They could setup internal NTP servers listening to GPS. Would
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:42:55AM -0800, Paul Ferguson wrote:
[snip]
Taken to the logical extreme, the right thing to do is to deny any
spoofed traffic from abusing these services altogether. NTP is not the
only one; there is also SNMP, DNS, etc.
...and then we're back to implement BCP38
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2/14/2014 3:00 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 2/14/2014 12:42 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Taken to the logical extreme, the right thing to do is to deny
any spoofed traffic from abusing these services altogether.
Since the 1990s I have argued
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2/14/2014 4:09 PM, Joe Provo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:42:55AM -0800, Paul Ferguson wrote:
[snip]
Taken to the logical extreme, the right thing to do is to deny
any spoofed traffic from abusing these services altogether. NTP
is not
On 2/14/2014 9:07 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Indeed -- I'm not in the business of bit-shipping these days, so I
can't endorse or advocate any particular method of blocking spoofed IP
packets in your gear.
If you're dead-end, a basic ACL that permits ONLY your prefixes on
egress, and blocks your
18 matches
Mail list logo
