Dobbins, Roland writes:
Operators are using this size-based filtering to effect without
breaking the world.
As a reality check, with this filtering in place does ntptrace still
work?
H
On Friday, February 21, 2014 08:57:07 AM Song Li wrote:
the AS relationship between AS1 and AS2/3 is peer, and
AS1 cannot announce routes from AS3 to provider1 by
rule.
Or even Peer-AS2's routes to Peer-AS3 (and vice versa), in
general best practice filtering rules, unless transit is
In Atlanta doing an install for a client this weekend and it appears that
the fiber/ethernet patch cables won't be delivered in time from supplier.
Would anyone know of a good resource for patch cables (both fiber and
ethernet) in the metro area? Just wondering if there are any other
resources for
Thanks. I'm doing some research on route leaks, you are a great help to me.
Sky li
On Friday, February 21, 2014 08:57:07 AM Song Li wrote:
the AS relationship between AS1 and AS2/3 is peer, and
AS1 cannot announce routes from AS3 to provider1 by
rule.
Or even Peer-AS2's routes to Peer-AS3
Biggest unknown at this point is your upstream SNR. If there is noise
ingress somewhere in the plant, then your upstream could be having all
kinds of issues.
Robert
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 05:23:07 -0500
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
Works:
Downstream Channel
Downstream
Hi folks,
I wonder if anyone has good experiences to share with out-of-band hardware?
I'm looking for a good OOB hardware vendor. I need to manage my
routers/switches/firewalls in a datacenter located overseas, and I'm looking to
setup a good serial console server via an OOB link.
I've been
NANOGers -
Just a reminder that there is a ARIN+NANOG on the Road session taking place
in San Diego next week; the day long program has NANOG and ARIN speakers
and is free but advance registration is recommended. If you know anyone who
might benefit from attending such an event,
On 02/20/2014 10:08 AM, Nick Cameo wrote:
Hello Everyone,
According to mtr command we are consistently seeing
level3_bx4-montrealak.net
dropping 30-50% of packets. Our ISP is Bell Canada. Any ideas on how to get
this resolved are greatly appreciated.
HOST: victoriaLoss%
Thank you all for clarifying. Really appreciate it.
We have both lantronix and opengear hardware and use the og brand almost
exclusively now. Good price, extremely reliable. We have about 200 of
them.
On Feb 21, 2014 9:41 AM, Hank Disuko gourmetci...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I wonder if anyone has good experiences to share with
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:23 AM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not seeing any big difference in SNR (and only slight differences
in upstream power) and everything else seems to be the same. Though,
since db is logarithmic, .3 might be enough to matter?
Do you also receive an
Using open gear exclusively now...no real issues with it.
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 21, 2014, at 6:39 AM, Hank Disuko gourmetci...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I wonder if anyone has good experiences to share with out-of-band hardware?
I'm looking for a good OOB hardware vendor. I need to
Same here, dozens of opengear devices deployed, about half with cellular,
only issue we ever had 1 DOA (not totally dead, but behaving really badly)
unit and they sent an overnight replacement since we were on the road
visiting a remote site.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Kenneth McRae
On 02/19/2014 01:14 PM, Phil Gardner wrote:
Not sure if this list is the best place, but it is probably the only
list that I'm on that won't give me a bunch of grief about the chosen
technology.
I looked at VMware's site, and there are a ton of options. I'm wondering
if anyone has some basic
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Phil Gardner phil.gardne...@gmail.comwrote:
On 02/19/2014 01:14 PM, Phil Gardner wrote:
Not sure if this list is the best place, but it is probably the only
list that I'm on that won't give me a bunch of grief about the chosen
technology.
I looked at
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
Lantronix is pretty solid if it doesn't have issues with your hardware.
I have a bunch of older Dell boxes where turning on virtual media makes
them stall indefinitely on the boot prompt.
Though, for serial only stuff -- it should be pretty good.
On 2/22/2014 午前 12:39, Bryan Socha wrote:
We
I just want to publicly say hats off to Akamai today.
We have seen spikes on our Akamai server before, but nothing like it has been
in the last few days with the Canadian hockey live streaming.
IOS7 release from Apple spiked it, but today, almost 800 megs of traffic coming
off our server
I would have figured an IX like that would have something there? Even BCNet has some
akamai stuff
within their network.
We are pretty small in the scheme of things and have had Akamai for quite a few years, but
this is the biggest event we have ever
seen on our server.
On 2/21/2014 10:47 AM,
They have TORIX connections, but they didn't seem to send the stream traffic
through them.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2014-02-21, at 1:56 PM, Keith kwo...@citywest.ca wrote:
I would have figured an IX like that would have something there? Even BCNet
has some akamai stuff
within their network.
We're really pleased with the Perle IOLAN line. They even have a gigabit
port without a $10k price tag. Amazing!
It really dumbfounds me why so many vendors are still putting 10/100
Ethernet ports on their OOB management (looking at you OpenGear).
Especially a PITA today since many switchports
OpenGear's newer stuff is Gigabit (SFP even).
I've not seen any real switch made in the last decade that has a problem with
100Mb/s connections. Ancient cisco, maybe had issues.
thanks,
-Randy
--
Randy Carpenter
Vice President - IT Services
First Network Group, Inc.
(800)578-6381, Opt. 1
Everyone,
We do have an issue at the TorIX.
We have isolated it to a hardware bug impacting our networking and
we're working to get it fixed ASAP. It's not likely to be entirely
fixed prior to the end of the Winter Olympics. We have a workaround
that should allow us to serve more traffic locally
On 2/21/2014 2:27 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
OpenGear's newer stuff is Gigabit (SFP even).
I've not seen any real switch made in the last decade that has a problem with
100Mb/s connections. Ancient cisco, maybe had issues.
There's several devices that are 1/10Gb and do NOT support 10/100Mb.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Damian Menscher dam...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:51 PM, John Weekes j...@nuclearfallout.net wrote:
On 2/20/2014 12:41 PM, Edward Roels wrote:
Curious if anyone else
This report has been generated at Fri Feb 21 21:13:38 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
BGP Update Report
Interval: 13-Feb-14 -to- 20-Feb-14 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS731569280 3.1% 989.7 -- COLOMBIA TELECOMUNICACIONES
S.A. ESP
2 - AS60349
Hi
The following would probably be illegal so do not actually do this. But
what if... there are just 4 billion IPv4 addresses. Scanning that
address-space for open NTP is trivially done in a few hours. Abusing these
servers for reflection attack is as trivial, hence the problem. How can we
get
On 21 February 2014 14:08, Baldur Norddahl baldur.nordd...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
The following would probably be illegal so do not actually do this. But
what if... there are just 4 billion IPv4 addresses. Scanning that
address-space for open NTP is trivially done in a few hours. Abusing these
On Feb 22, 2014 5:30 AM, Damian Menscher dam...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Cb B cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Damian Menscher dam...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net
wrote:
You may also
On (2014-02-21 15:17 -0600), Jeremy Bresley wrote:
connections to devices that needed them. Expensive options in a
fully loaded chassis just for a couple lower-end devices that could
easily justify a couple dollars more to get a Gig PHY instead of the
older 100Mb PHY chip.
There is no
Thinklogical Sentinel is great. CLI access via ssh, web access, modem for
dial in and two ethernet ports for redundant network access, supports up to
32 devices and is dc/ac http://www.thinklogical.com/sentinel
Well, ain't that great day to finish the week. Some one today me a
submarine cable is cut.
Most of the networks in LAX that has peering with CU looks congested to
hell now. Anyone else here seeing the same thing?
What do you see? Packet loss? Latency?
Mehmet
On Feb 22, 2014, at 4:14, Yucong Sun sunyuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, ain't that great day to finish the week. Some one today me a
submarine cable is cut.
Most of the networks in LAX that has peering with CU looks congested to
hell now.
Isn't UDP 80 still technically registered to HTTP?
~Seth
Hi,
some of our users have forwarded the email to Gmail and Gmail now are
complaining that this is bulk mail and delaying it.
We have SPF, DKIM, DMARC, even SRS to try these things do not happen :(
Anyone know if there is any new policy in Gmail about that?
Above all, the message refers to
If anyone with ability to fix this is reading this - contact me offlist
and I'll owe you...
I'm trying to change an host (name server) address.
I've been emailing ipv6...@networksolutions.com back and forth for several
days. After fighting through 'authentication' (which btw I *didn't*
The correct URL should be https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Eduardo A. Suárez
esua...@fcaglp.fcaglp.unlp.edu.ar wrote:
Hi,
some of our users have forwarded the email to Gmail and Gmail now are
complaining that this is bulk mail and delaying it.
It is quicker and easier to transfer your domain to another registrar,
even though you will have to call them up and speak to a person to do
it.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:01:06PM -0500, Brandon Applegate wrote:
If anyone with ability to fix this is reading this - contact me
offlist and I'll
NANOG Community-
I hope everyone enjoyed NANOG 60, NANOG’s largest attended winter meeting.
Fresh off a great meeting, and post our NANOG Icelanta Reception, we are ready
start the process for NANOG 61 in Bellevue. NANOG 61 will be NANOG’s 20th year
serving the network operator community and
Auto forwarded mail is like that. Any inbound spam your users receive also
gets forwarded. So...
On 22-Feb-2014 1:00 AM, Eduardo A. Suárez
esua...@fcaglp.fcaglp.unlp.edu.ar wrote:
Hi,
some of our users have forwarded the email to Gmail and Gmail now are
complaining that this is bulk mail and
On (2014-02-21 14:37 -0800), Cb B wrote:
QUIC can do what it wants. Like anyone else, they pay their money and take
their chances. But, the data point that UDP is polluted is clearly
documented with several folks on this list suggesting tactical fixes that
involve limiting UDP, especially
42 matches
Mail list logo
