On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:59:10PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> wm0: flags=0x8843 mtu 1500
[..]
> inet6 fe80::ec4:7aff:fe33:2c6c%wm0/64 flags 0 scopeid 0x1
> inet 192.168.60.238/24 broadcast 192.168.60.255 flags 0
> inet 192.168.60.189/24 broadcast 192.168.60.255 flags 0
>
Derrick Lobo wrote:
Hi All
I have noticed the USB install taking way too long anyone else noticed it
Based on regular instructions I used the usb installer rawrite32 to
create a usb install stick
The installs for all netbsd10-rcx have been taking roughly 25 minutes,
when I do an upgrade from
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 08:18:14PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> Hi Thierry
>
> Manual untar seems fine no issues at all. This seems more like
> copying the file between usb to the local drive as I see stalls when
> the file is copied over
But you said the time was spent in the download mostly -
Hi All
After upgrading to netbsd10 rc5 I see the following errors on dmesg all the ips
listed are aliased address on the same device we never got these error as same
hardware was upgraded from 8 to 9.3 year/s ago and now to 10 rc5. The Aliased
ip come through a startup script, they are not
Hi Thierry
Manual untar seems fine no issues at all. This seems more like copying the file
between usb to the local drive as I see stalls when the file is copied over
I am hoping someone can reproduce this issue I have reproduced this on 6
servers.. most of them supermicros 1 was a lanner
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 04:57:00PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:52:15PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> > I ended just untaring the sets and running etcupdate as that was much
> > quicker
>
> Huh? If that was much quicker (you were running the same kernel, from the
>
Most of the time was spent downloading the tarfile and extracting from the USB
once the files are download the install completes quickly
-Original Message-
From: Martin Husemann
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2024 10:57 AM
To: Derrick Lobo
Cc: netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: EXT MAIL :
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:52:15PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> I ended just untaring the sets and running etcupdate as that was much
> quicker
Huh? If that was much quicker (you were running the same kernel, from the
install image?) - where did the upgrade spend all the additional time?
El domingo, 3 de marzo de 2024, Michael van Elst
escribió:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/57992; it has been noted by GNATS
