Lucifer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024, 5:16 PM beaker wrote:
>
> > m...@goathill.org (MLH) wrote:
> >
> > > It appears that some of the pkgsrc distfiles now are only available
> > > via ipv6 servers but how do you set ipv4_prefer mode so ipv6 attempts
>
m...@goathill.org (MLH) wrote:
> It appears that some of the pkgsrc distfiles now are only available
> via ipv6 servers but how do you set ipv4_prefer mode so ipv6 attempts
> don't prevent normal ipv4 operation?
>
> setting
> ip6addrctl_policy="ipv4_prefer"
>
> in rc.conf doesn't change to normal
David Brownlee wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 at 02:27, beaker wrote:
> > I have a 9.3/i386 VM on which I recently ran
> > $ sudo pkgin update ; sudo pkgin upgrade ;sudo pkgin autoremove
> >
> > which worked but subsequent attempts to use pkgin repo
Hello,
I have a 9.3/i386 VM on which I recently ran
$ sudo pkgin update ; sudo pkgin upgrade ;sudo pkgin autoremove
which worked but subsequent attempts to use pkgin report the following error:
--
$ sudo pkgin update
cleaning database from
Greg Troxel wrote:
> In contemplating bulk builds and resources, I wonder if there are still
> people who:
>
> are running NetBSD/i386 (as opposed to amd64)
>
> are using the binary packges from quarterly branches on ftp.netbsd.org
>
> are running NetBSD 10 already, or who intend to move
pin wrote:
> Apparently nobody has answered your question in the mailing-list.
>
> > Is there a way to hold back packages from pkgin similar to 'apt-mark '
> > ?
>
> The short answer is no, there isn't.
>
> > The pkg in question is ../wm/dwm which I customize in pkgscr and install.
> > pkgin
Is there a way to hold back packages from pkgin similar to 'apt-mark ' ?
Didn't see anything in the manpage and when I try to use 'pkgin import
pkg_list.txt'
where the not-to-be-updated pkg has been removed pkgin STILL tries to update the
pkg. The pkg in question is ../wm/dwm which I customize
m...@goathill.org (MLH) wrote:
> My ~10 yr old i3-based box needs to be updated. I can't compile
> anything nontrivial without the box rebooting anymore.
I think your system should be able to build most packages just fine
though something like Gnome might take a while. Some packages,
ie. those
mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) wrote:
> bea...@sdf.org (beaker) writes:
>
> >Is it safe and sufficient to run 'mbrlabel -fw ' on NetBSD
> >whenever there has been partition resizing (usually via Gpartd)
> >such that the disklabel no longer reflects the curre
Is it safe and sufficient to run 'mbrlabel -fw ' on NetBSD
whenever there has been partition resizing (usually via Gpartd) such
that the disklabel no loner relects the current partitioning state?
System in question is an old 32bit i386 with MBR partition scheme on
sata disc hosting several
Is it safe and sufficient to run 'mbrlabel -fw ' on NetBSD
whenever there has been partition resizing (usually via Gpartd)
such that the disklabel no longer reflects the current partitioning
state?
System in question is an old 32bit i386 with an MBR partition scheme
on a SATA disc hosting several
So, what printers do NetBSD'ers use?
I use an HPLJ 2100TN. Has a Jet Direct card so really all you
need is a lpd of some sort. Can even ftp files to it.
Basically any network printer will likely work for you as long
as it speaks CUPS or Unix LPD.
12 matches
Mail list logo