On Thursday 26 October 2006 19:56, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:44:55 +0200
Daniel Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:51:28 +0200
Daniel Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Stephen,
currently the work to make the
[ ... ]
Dmitry Mishin wrote:
Stephen,
Virtualized container can be secure, if it is complete system virtualization,
not just an application container. OpenVZ implements such and it is used hard
over the world. And of course, we care a lot to keep hostile root from
killing whole system.
* David Miller | 2006-10-26 17:02:21 [-0700]:
Your email client turned the tabs into spaces in the patch making it
useless.
Sorry my mistake! I am en route and I paste the patch into my editor, who eat
all tabs. One more time: sorry!
Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to change
Looking at all scenarios I feel the first patch is OK. Can you add the
watchdog timer fix to first initial patch and resubmit.
-Original Message-
From: Linas Vepstas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 3:52 PM
To: Ananda Raju
Cc: Wen Xiong;
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:43:11 +0200
Hagen Paul Pfeifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* David Miller | 2006-10-26 17:02:21 [-0700]:
Your email client turned the tabs into spaces in the patch making it
useless.
Sorry my mistake! I am en route and I paste the patch into my editor, who eat
all
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:04:32PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
no objections, so I'll ACK it with the notion that I'm going to let our
labs do some more testing on it with all the latest changes to it.
Thanks, Auke. Here's the equivalent patch for e1000. I don't have a
* Stephen Hemminger | 2006-10-27 07:41:02 [-0700]:
Please no, it makes the socket option useless.
Technical no, in the sense of usability for everybody yes. You are right
Stephen, as a programmer I understand you complete!
But on the other side: We know for sure that this IS a problem if we
Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
* Stephen Hemminger | 2006-10-27 07:41:02 [-0700]:
Please no, it makes the socket option useless.
Technical no, in the sense of usability for everybody yes. You are right
Stephen, as a programmer I understand you complete!
But on the other side: We know for
Hello,
another manpage, this time for rtmon. Would be great if it could be
applied to the next release too.
regards,
-mika-
--
,'`. http://www.michael-prokop.at/
( grml.org -ยป Linux Live-CD for texttool-users and sysadmins
`._,' http://www.grml.org/
.TH RTMON 8
.SH NAME
rtmon
The sky2 driver is no longer in experimental state.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- sky2.orig/drivers/net/Kconfig 2006-10-27 10:16:44.0 -0700
+++ sky2/drivers/net/Kconfig2006-10-27 10:20:20.0 -0700
@@ -2112,7 +2112,7 @@
config SKY2
Core files.
This patch includes core kevent files:
* userspace controlling
* kernelspace interfaces
* initialization
* notification state machines
Some bits of documentation can be found on project's homepage (and links from
there):
Timer notifications.
Timer notifications can be used for fine grained per-process time
management, since interval timers are very inconvenient to use,
and they are limited.
This subsystem uses high-resolution timers.
id.raw[0] is used as number of seconds
id.raw[1] is used as number of
Generic event handling mechanism.
Consider for inclusion.
Changes from 'take20' patchset:
* new ring buffer implementation
* removed artificial limit on possible number of kevents
With this release and fixed userspace web server it was possible to
achive 3960+ req/s with client connection
Socket notifications.
This patch includes socket send/recv/accept notifications.
Using trivial web server based on kevent and this features
instead of epoll it's performance increased more than noticebly.
More details about various benchmarks and server itself
(evserver_kevent.c) can be found
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Glenn Grundstrom wrote:
diff -ruNp old/drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/Makefile
new/drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/Makefile
--- old/drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/Makefile1969-12-31
18:00:00.0 -0600
+++ new/drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/Makefile2006-10-25
[...snip...]
+extern void set_interface(
+UINT32ip_addr,
These should probably be the standard linux types u32, or uint32
+UINT32mask,
+UINT32bcastaddr,
+
My proposed method restricting TCP choices to fair algorithms.
This a net wide, not system wide issue, it should not be done
by kernel policy choice (capability), but by a build choice.
--- sky2.orig/net/ipv4/Kconfig 2006-10-27 10:10:47.0 -0700
+++ sky2/net/ipv4/Kconfig 2006-10-27
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:22:11 +0200
Michael Prokop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
User-Agent: mutt-ng devel-r316 (Debian)
Hello,
added.
--
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
I think unfair is a difficult word. Unfair to what? It's true that
Scalable TCP is unfair to itself in that flows with unequal shares do
not converge, but it's not clear what its interactions are with other
congestion control algorithms. It's not clear to me that it's
significantly more
If application asks for a congestion control type with setsockopt()
then it may be available as a module not included in the kernel already.
If it has permission to load modules then the tcp congestion
module should be autoloaded if needed. This is done already when
the default selection is
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 03:19 +0300, Ville Nuorvala wrote:
As the IPv6 route lookup now also returns the selected source address
there is no need for a separate source address lookup. In fact, the
source address selection needs to be moved to get_dst() because the
selected IPv6 source address
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 07:35:18AM -0400, Ananda Raju wrote:
Looking at all scenarios I feel the first patch is OK. Can you add the
watchdog timer fix to first initial patch and resubmit.
Appended below.
So -- just for grins, I thought to myself, Maybe I can make
s2io be the first adapter
I don't think the userspace stuff belongs on netdev. Someone please
correct me if I'm wrong.
Yeah, it's not a bad thing to get wider review, but your userspace
library is pretty much your business. If you screw it up it doesn't
hurt anyone else, so I'm happy to let you write it however you
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:56:45 -0700
Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the userspace stuff belongs on netdev. Someone please
correct me if I'm wrong.
Yeah, it's not a bad thing to get wider review, but your userspace
library is pretty much your business. If you screw
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:30:16 -0700
My proposed method restricting TCP choices to fair algorithms.
This a net wide, not system wide issue, it should not be done
by kernel policy choice (capability), but by a build choice.
I think this sucks even
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:41:02 -0700
Please no, it makes the socket option useless.
If you want to tag some bad apples thats okay, but would need
some more infrastructure.
The behavior of the TCP stack is a system wide decision.
If anything it
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:30:16 -0700
My proposed method restricting TCP choices to fair algorithms.
This a net wide, not system wide issue, it should not be done
by
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:24:02 -0700
Only some (very few) have any bad consequences. So the typical
distribution should be able to switch with most available for everyone,
and only a few needing special privileges.
I would strongly disagree as we've
Hello,
I'd like to find/gather estimates about 2.4 vs 2.6 share in [small]
linux routers in 2006. Can anyone offer estimates and/or references ?
My own estimate is that definite majority is 2.4 (I'd say 75% for 2.4),
in small linux routers in 2006. Can anyone offer support or correction ?
Hello,
I'd like to find/gather estimates about 2.4 vs 2.6 share in [small]
linux routers in 2006. Can anyone offer estimates and/or references ?
My own estimate is that definite majority is 2.4 (I'd say 75% for 2.4),
in small linux routers in 2006. Can anyone offer support or correction ?
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:24:02 -0700
Only some (very few) have any bad consequences. So the typical
distribution should be able to switch with most available for
Please stop all of this cross posting. I've just seen you post
this same exact email on the netfilter lists too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:59:13 -0700
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:24:02 -0700
Only some (very few) have any bad
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:59:13 -0700
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:21:49 -0700
The restricted flag patch which you have ignored, would be a way to
allow them to be configured but tag the bad apples for only
root usage.
I haven't ignored it, it's in my backlog below more important
things like
On 10/28/06, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please stop all of this cross posting. I've just seen you post
this same exact email on the netfilter lists too.
Sorry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
How about another way of controlling this via sysctl.
First, add code to for read only:
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_available_congestion_control (or shorter name)
this will show all things compiled in (even if not loaded yet). Similar
to
tsk, tsk:
fatal: 7 lines add trailing whitespaces.
applied to for-2.6.19 anyway, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Applied, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Nice way to see what congestion control modules are loaded.
It does impose a soft limit of 32 possibilities.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/sysctl.h |1 +
include/net/tcp.h |3 +++
net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 25
40 matches
Mail list logo
