On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:22:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:00:14 +0200
I'm seeing an Oops[1] with a 2.6.19.2 kernel:
Frederik, I finally was able to spend some quality time on
this issue today. Sorry for taking so
From: Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:00:14 +0200
I'm seeing an Oops[1] with a 2.6.19.2 kernel:
Frederik, I finally was able to spend some quality time on
this issue today. Sorry for taking so long.
I came up with a series of two patches, the first one makes
the
From: Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:00:14 +0200
I think that not unix_state_rlock'ing other in
unix_dgram_connect may cause it to become NULL while passing it to
selinux_socket_unix_may_send. With the following patch applied, I've
seen no oops so far (1-2 hours
Hi David,
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 03:20:54AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:00:14 +0200
I think that not unix_state_rlock'ing other in
unix_dgram_connect may cause it to become NULL while passing it to
Hi,
I'm seeing an Oops[1] with a 2.6.19.2 kernel:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
018c
printing eip:
c01cc54f
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler nfsd exportfs i8xx_tco
i2c_dev
