Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

Roland Dreier wrote: It happens only when ib interfaces are slaves of a bonding device. I thought before that the stuck is in napi_disable() but it's almost right. I put prints before and after call to napi_disable and see that it is called twice. I'll try to investigate in this

Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

I will be near my lab only tomorrow... I will check this and let you know. On 10/11/07, Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It happens only when ib interfaces are slaves of a bonding device. I thought before that the stuck is in napi_disable() but it's almost right. I put prints

Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

Roland Dreier wrote: I also ran a test for the code in the branch of 2.6.24 and found a problem. I see that ifconfig down doesn't return (for IPoIB interfaces) and it's stuck in napi_disable() in the kernel (any idea why?) For what it's worth, I took the upstream 2.6.23 git tree and

Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

It happens only when ib interfaces are slaves of a bonding device. I thought before that the stuck is in napi_disable() but it's almost right. I put prints before and after call to napi_disable and see that it is called twice. I'll try to investigate in this direction. ib0:

Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Yes, two napi_disable()s in a row without a matching napi_enable() will deadlock. I guess the question is why the ipoib interface is being stopped twice. If you just take the net-2.6.24 tree (without bonding patches), does bonding for ethernet

Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

Jay Vosburgh wrote: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:56:35 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: applied patches 1-9 the only thing that was a hiccup during submission is that your email subject lines did not contain a notion of

Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

I also ran a test for the code in the branch of 2.6.24 and found a problem. I see that ifconfig down doesn't return (for IPoIB interfaces) and it's stuck in napi_disable() in the kernel (any idea why?) For what it's worth, I took the upstream 2.6.23 git tree and merged in Dave's latest

Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

Jeff Garzik wrote: applied patches 1-9 the only thing that was a hiccup during submission is that your email subject lines did not contain a notion of ordering [PATCH 1/9] But other than that, the git-send-email went flawlessly. unfortunately it does not seem to build flawlessly:

Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:56:35 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: applied patches 1-9 the only thing that was a hiccup during submission is that your email subject lines did not contain a notion of ordering [PATCH 1/9] But other than that, the

Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue

David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:56:35 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: applied patches 1-9 the only thing that was a hiccup during submission is that your email subject lines did not contain a notion of ordering [PATCH 1/9]