I need to do some additional testing next week (taking PTO the next 2
days), but this should fix your problem. Can you confirm? This is
better than a sysctl to handle the known use cases, but it does not
handle a combination of the 2 known use cases (e.g., throw your use
case into a VRF).
diff
On 8/3/16 5:02 PM, subas...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> I can't explain the iptables output but from a FIB lookup perspective
>> it is using table 8 per the FIB rules, the xfrm is hit and packets
>> shift to 192.168.77.1 and go out what you have as eth0.
>>
>> Take a look at:
>> perf record -e
I can't explain the iptables output but from a FIB lookup perspective
it is using table 8 per the FIB rules, the xfrm is hit and packets
shift to 192.168.77.1 and go out what you have as eth0.
Take a look at:
perf record -e fib:* -a -g
perf script
And then run tcpdump on both eth0 and eth1.
On 7/29/16 12:21 PM, subas...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Please don't try to workaround a bug with a sysctl.
If we have a bug here, we should fix it. Choosing
between bug A and bug B with a sysctl is not what
we are doing ;)
Sure, this was just a quick hack.
Can you give an example of your use
Please don't try to workaround a bug with a sysctl.
If we have a bug here, we should fix it. Choosing
between bug A and bug B with a sysctl is not what
we are doing ;)
Sure, this was just a quick hack.
Can you give an example of your use case -- e.g., commands for others
(me) to reproduce?
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:34:32PM -0600, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
> We are seeing incorrect routing when tunneling packets over an
> interface and sending it over another interface. This scenario
> worked on 3.18 (and earlier) and failed on 4.4 kernel. The rules
> / routes / policies
On 7/25/16 6:34 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
We are seeing incorrect routing when tunneling packets over an
interface and sending it over another interface. This scenario
worked on 3.18 (and earlier) and failed on 4.4 kernel. The rules
/ routes / policies were the same across
We are seeing incorrect routing when tunneling packets over an
interface and sending it over another interface. This scenario
worked on 3.18 (and earlier) and failed on 4.4 kernel. The rules
/ routes / policies were the same across kernels.
Commit 42a7b32b73d6 ("xfrm: Add oif to dst lookups")
