On 10 May 2006, at 00:51, Chris Wright wrote:
* Herbert Xu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ netdev-features= NETIF_F_IP_CSUM;
Any reason why IP_CSUM was chosen instead of HW_CSUM? Doing the latter
would seem to be in fact easier for a
Hi Chris:
Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/** Send a packet on a net device to encourage switches to learn the
+ * MAC. We send a fake ARP request.
+ *
+ * @param dev device
+ * @return 0 on success, error code otherwise
+ */
+static int send_fake_arp(struct net_device *dev)
I
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:55:33PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Hi Chris:
Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/** Send a packet on a net device to encourage switches to learn the
+ * MAC. We send a fake ARP request.
+ *
+ * @param dev device
+ * @return 0 on success, error code
Christian Limpach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's at least two reasons why having it in the driver is preferable:
- synchronizing sending the fake ARP request with when the device is
operational -- you really want to make this well synchronized to keep
unreachability as short as possible,
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 15:01, Herbert Xu wrote:
Christian Limpach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's at least two reasons why having it in the driver is preferable:
- synchronizing sending the fake ARP request with when the device is
operational -- you really want to make this well
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:01:05PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Christian Limpach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's at least two reasons why having it in the driver is preferable:
- synchronizing sending the fake ARP request with when the device is
operational -- you really want to make this
Christian Limpach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly having to page in the process and switching to it would add
to the live migration time. More importantly, having to install an
additional program in the guest is certainly not very convenient.
Sorry I'm still not convinced. What's there
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:26:03PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Christian Limpach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly having to page in the process and switching to it would add
to the live migration time. More importantly, having to install an
additional program in the guest is certainly not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/09/2006 09:00:27 AM:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:26:03PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Christian Limpach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly having to page in the process and switching to it would add
to the live migration time. More importantly, having to
Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ netdev-features= NETIF_F_IP_CSUM;
Any reason why IP_CSUM was chosen instead of HW_CSUM? Doing the latter
would seem to be in fact easier for a virtual driver, no?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu
* Herbert Xu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ netdev-features= NETIF_F_IP_CSUM;
Any reason why IP_CSUM was chosen instead of HW_CSUM? Doing the latter
would seem to be in fact easier for a virtual driver, no?
That, I really don't know.
11 matches
Mail list logo
