Chunghwa Telecom votes “Yes” on NS-003. Thanks.

 

 

 

Li-Chun Chen

                     Chunghwa Telecom 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Netsec <netsec-boun...@cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Ryan Dickson via Netsec
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 4:57 AM
To: Clint Wilson <cli...@apple.com>; CABF Network Security WG 
<netsec@cabforum.org>
Subject: [外部郵件]Re: [cabf_netsec] Voting Period Begins | Ballot NS-003: 
Restructure the NCSSRs

 

Google votes "Yes" on NS-003.

 

 

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:59 AM Clint Wilson via Netsec < 
<mailto:netsec@cabforum.org%20%3cmailto:netsec@cabforum.org> 
netsec@cabforum.org <mailto:netsec@cabforum.org> > wrote:

 

 

        Ballot NS-003 is proposed by Clint Wilson of Apple and endorsed by 
Trevoli Ponds-White of Amazon and David Kluge of Google Trust Services.

 

        Purpose of Ballot

 

        This ballot proposes a comprehensive restructuring of the Network and 
Certificate System Security Requirements (NCSSRs), excepting Section 4. The 
current structure of the document has proven to be challenging for creating 
ballots, contains duplicated requirements, and separates similar requirements 
across the document. These issues have led to inefficiencies in managing and 
implementing security standards. Therefore, this proposal aims to streamline 
the document's structure, eliminate redundancies, improve comprehensibility, 
and enhance clarity and coherence.

 

        Reasons for Proposal:

 

 

        *      Complexity in Ballot Creation: The current document structure 
can make it difficult to create and manage ballots efficiently, leading to 
somewhat awkward updating processes, abandoned ballots, and a lack of 
confidence that ballots effect the intended changes.

        *      Redundancy: Over time, some parts of the NCSSRs have touched on 
the same topic, leading to some duplication across the document and further to 
confusion and inconsistency in implementation.

        *      Fragmentation: Similar requirements for different parts of a 
CA’s NCSSR-relevant infrastructure are scattered throughout the document, 
making it somewhat more difficult for to locate and comprehend a complete 
picture of these requirements effectively.

        *      Minor Issues: The document contains other, more minor issues 
that also impede its usability and effectiveness, such as missing definitions, 
unclear list structures, and requirements that are more optional than they may 
currently appear.

 

 

        Benefits of the Updated Document Structure:

 

 

        *      Enhanced Clarity: The revised structure should improve the 
clarity and coherence of the document, making the requirements it represents 
easier to understand, as well as result in greater consistency when 
implementing or assessing its security requirements.

        *      Future Updates: A more granular document structure should 
improve the process of creating and managing ballots in the future. Similarly, 
the improved proximity of related requirements should hopefully aid in 
identifying the areas the NCSSRs can most benefit from further attention.

        *      Grouping and De-duplication of Similar Requirements: By 
consolidating duplicated requirements, the updated document should make it much 
easier to find, comprehend, assess, and implement related requirements.

        *      Clearer Recommendations: The updated document includes a number 
of additional “SHOULD”-type stipulations, clarifying some of the language in 
the current NCSSRs such that it’s easier to identify where the NCSSRs impose a 
strict requirement as opposed to a strong recommendation.

 

 

        Overall, this ballot proposal seeks to address existing challenges in 
updating the current version of the NCSSRs and pave the way for future 
improvements to the NCSSRs.

 

        MOTION BEGINS

 

        This ballot modifies the “Network and Certificate System Security 
Requirements” as follows, based on version 1.7:

 

 
<https://github.com/cabforum/netsec/compare/c62a2f88e252de5c79b101fa3c9e9c536388639a...8bd66d27c07e30d1f4d9e6dd57b075bca499bf2e>
 
https://github.com/cabforum/netsec/compare/c62a2f88e252de5c79b101fa3c9e9c536388639a...8bd66d27c07e30d1f4d9e6dd57b075bca499bf2e
 < 
<https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fnetsec%2Fcompare%2Fc62a2f88e252de5c79b101fa3c9e9c536388639a...8bd66d27c07e30d1f4d9e6dd57b075bca499bf2e&data=05%7C02%7Crealsky%40cht.com.tw%7C4754871dbe2c47e10f1e08dc688eedb1%7C54eb9440cf0345fe835e61bd4ce515c8%7C0%7C0%7C638500210295474559%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WKNbjApmzhUIxkfDf8AEhxjX2%2B2j%2FoB9UQMM0GdqrO4%3D&reserved=0>
 
https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcabforum%2Fnetsec%2Fcompare%2Fc62a2f88e252de5c79b101fa3c9e9c536388639a...8bd66d27c07e30d1f4d9e6dd57b075bca499bf2e&data=05%7C02%7Crealsky%40cht.com.tw%7C4754871dbe2c47e10f1e08dc688eedb1%7C54eb9440cf0345fe835e61bd4ce515c8%7C0%7C0%7C638500210295474559%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WKNbjApmzhUIxkfDf8AEhxjX2%2B2j%2FoB9UQMM0GdqrO4%3D&reserved=0>
 

 

        MOTION ENDS

 

        The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

 

        Discussion Period (14+ days)

 

        Start Time: 2024-April-09 16:00 UTC

        End Time: 2024-April-23 15:59 UTC

 

        Voting Period (7 days)

 

        Start Time: 2024-April-23 16:00 UTC

        End Time: 2024-April-30 16:00 UTC

        _______________________________________________

        Netsec mailing list

         <mailto:Netsec@cabforum.org> Netsec@cabforum.org < 
<mailto:Netsec@cabforum.org> mailto:Netsec@cabforum.org> 

         <https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/netsec> 
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/netsec < 
<https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.cabforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnetsec&data=05%7C02%7Crealsky%40cht.com.tw%7C4754871dbe2c47e10f1e08dc688eedb1%7C54eb9440cf0345fe835e61bd4ce515c8%7C0%7C0%7C638500210295483773%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2BObriwSsf7qyaOXSKMfM%2FMmUf7EPTnqWfgMPnqCuzzU%3D&reserved=0>
 
https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.cabforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnetsec&data=05%7C02%7Crealsky%40cht.com.tw%7C4754871dbe2c47e10f1e08dc688eedb1%7C54eb9440cf0345fe835e61bd4ce515c8%7C0%7C0%7C638500210295483773%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2BObriwSsf7qyaOXSKMfM%2FMmUf7EPTnqWfgMPnqCuzzU%3D&reserved=0>
 

        

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Netsec mailing list
Netsec@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/netsec

Reply via email to