Re: URL lengths

2017-11-30 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 30 Nov, Tim Hill wrote in message <56a3223323...@timil.com>: > I just can't believe that a URL can contain 33% more letters than the King > James Bible's 3,116,480. > > "four gigabytes per URL" > > LOL In RISC OS terms, it's another way of saying "limited by available memory"... --

Re: URL lengths

2017-11-30 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 30 Nov, Harriet Bazley wrote in message : > On 28 Nov 2017 as I do recall, > Daniel Silverstone wrote: > > > I don't believe we limit URL length per-se, though they get interned and > > as such four gigabytes per URL is probably the absolute

Re: URL lengths

2017-11-30 Thread Richard Torrens (lists)
In article <56a1aa7e00joh...@ukgateway.net>, John Williams wrote: > What is the maximum URL length (including POST data) that NetSurf can > handle? What may be relevant is the following entry from my web server error logs: 2017-10-02 02:57:45: (response.c.553) file not

Re: URL lengths

2017-11-30 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:32:29PM +, Tim Hill wrote: > > I just can't believe that a URL can contain 33% more letters than the > King James Bible's 3,116,480. > > "four gigabytes per URL" It's probably much greater than that on modern systems, too! B.

Re: URL lengths

2017-11-30 Thread Tim Hill
In article , Harriet Bazley wrote: > On 28 Nov 2017 as I do recall, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 18:08:46 +, John Williams wrote: > > > What is the maximum URL length (including POST data) that NetSurf >