On Tuesday 05 Apr 2005 01:11, Bryan Phinney wrote:
So, when someone suggests that a Linux app be coded to provide the same
false sense of security to users, when there are myriad choices of real
firewalls as well as methods to lock the system down that are not trivially
bypassed, some of us
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 04:49, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 05 Apr 2005 01:11, Bryan Phinney wrote:
So, when someone suggests that a Linux app be coded to provide the same
false sense of security to users, when there are myriad choices of real
firewalls as well as methods to lock the
On Tuesday 05 Apr 2005 11:13, Bryan Phinney wrote:
I think what people really want is something like a dialogue box on any
dial-out from an application that gives the option of
this session
always
never
so that they can block automatic dial outs but allow genuine ones.
An app
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 06:26, Anne Wilson wrote:
An app that knows the difference between these two things? That's not
asking for much now, is it? If I could build such a thing, nobody on
this group could afford it, Cisco and the other router manufacturers
would be in a bidding war to
On Tuesday 05 Apr 2005 11:57, Bryan Phinney wrote:
Well, I did suggest that they pay someone to develop such an app as I
didn't think that there would be a big Linux audience for it. (The fact
that there is not a current project for such a thing, to my knowledge,
would tend to bear that
From: Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 06:26, Anne Wilson wrote:
An app that knows the difference between these two things? That's not
asking for much now, is it? If I could build such a thing, nobody on
this group could afford it, Cisco and the other router
On Tuesday 05 Apr 2005 19:37, jdow wrote:
So you simply block all ports for AcroRead. That's as easy as only
blocking port 80.
The cute problem is when you want to read a pdf file in your browser.
It is probably better to save the pdf file and only allow AcroRead to
access local files.
I
Il mar, 2005-04-05 alle 21:05, Anne Wilson ha scritto:
On Tuesday 05 Apr 2005 19:37, jdow wrote:
The cute problem is when you want to read a pdf file in your browser.
It is probably better to save the pdf file and only allow AcroRead to
access local files.
I do tend to view the pdf in
From: frengoGorgia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il mar, 2005-04-05 alle 21:05, Anne Wilson ha scritto:
On Tuesday 05 Apr 2005 19:37, jdow wrote:
The cute problem is when you want to read a pdf file in your browser.
It is probably better to save the pdf file and only allow AcroRead to
access
Il mer, 2005-04-06 alle 04:11, jdow ha scritto:
From: frengoGorgia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il mar, 2005-04-05 alle 21:05, Anne Wilson ha scritto:
On Tuesday 05 Apr 2005 19:37, jdow wrote:
The cute problem is when you want to read a pdf file in your browser.
It is probably better to
- Original Message -
From: Angus Auld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: newbie@linux-mandrake.com
Subject: [newbie] Firewall for allowing ports selectively
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:15:01 +0100
Dear All
Is there some
On Apr 3, 2005 9:02 PM, Angus Auld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some firewall (working through iptables) able to open
selectively a port for a specific program and not to all programs
installed? (Shorewall is not suitable for that purpose.)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mandrake.com] On Behalf Of Angus Auld
Sent: 04 April 2005 11:10
To: newbie@linux-mandrake.com
Subject: Re: [newbie] Firewall for allowing ports selectively
- Original Message -
From: Angus Auld
On Apr 4, 2005 11:01 PM, Stephen Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some firewall (working through iptables) able to open
selectively a port for a specific program and not to all programs
installed? (Shorewall is not suitable for that purpose.)
On Monday 04 April 2005 18:32, Paul Smith wrote:
I do belive this is being discussed in some context in the expert list as
well? Might be worth joining to follow the thread.
Since nobody answered suggesting a firewall with that feature, it may
be very complicated to achieve that, in case
Dear All
Is there some firewall (working through iptables) able to open
selectively a port for a specific program and not to all programs
installed? (Shorewall is not suitable for that purpose.)
Thanks in advance,
Paul
Want to buy your Pack
- Original Message -
From: Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: newbie@linux-mandrake.com
Subject: [newbie] Firewall for allowing ports selectively
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:15:01 +0100
Dear All
Is there some firewall (working through iptables) able to open
selectively a port
On January 6, 2005 08:53 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 11:34 pm, Miark wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:03:10 -0800, John wrote:
I wish I could say that Mr Eastep was either helpful or nice. I've
actually found him quite the arrogant, insulting boor. Particularly
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 11:34 pm, Miark wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:03:10 -0800, John wrote:
I wish I could say that Mr Eastep was either helpful or nice. I've
actually found him quite the arrogant, insulting boor. Particularly when
he knows you use Mandrake.
Oh well, perhaps
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:03:10 -0800, John wrote:
I wish I could say that Mr Eastep was either helpful or nice. I've actually
found him quite the arrogant, insulting boor. Particularly when he knows you
use Mandrake.
Oh well, perhaps it's just me :)
You just have that effect on people YOU
On December 29, 2004 04:09 pm, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
snip
Yes shorewall is a good one. I appreciate Mandrake includes it. A little
confusing at first, but once we read the tutorial, it's not that hard to
setup. And Tom Eastep - the writer - is very active in the shorewall list.
However, don't
On Thursday 30 December 2004 02:31 pm, neo wrote:
could someone tell me a good firewall for mandrake 10.1 thank you
I've been using Firehol (http://firehol.sourceforge.net/) successfully for
about a year now (on half a dozen Linux machines - some being servers, some
being just desktop units,
could someone tell me a good firewall for mandrake 10.1 thank you
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:31:07 -0500, neo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could someone tell me a good firewall for mandrake 10.1 thank you
iptables.Try it with firestarter(http://www.fs-security.com/).
--
Is that a 286 or are you just running Windows?
On Thursday 30 December 2004 03:31 pm, neo wrote:
could someone tell me a good firewall for mandrake 10.1 thank you
For a basic setup which in my opinion is very good, install iptables and
shorewall. This will get you started. I use iptables and firestarter
which can be found here.
thank you for the information i will look into it
n Thursday 30 December 2004 03:31 pm, neo wrote:
could someone tell me a good firewall for mandrake 10.1 thank you
For a basic setup which in my opinion is very good, install iptables and
shorewall. This will get you started. I
On Thursday 30 December 2004 04:03 am, Dan Gordon wrote:
On Thursday 30 December 2004 03:31 pm, neo wrote:
could someone tell me a good firewall for mandrake 10.1 thank you
For a basic setup which in my opinion is very good, install iptables and
shorewall. This will get you started. I use
Thank you for all the information i am reading in i as i write this e mail looks like a really good program for a firewall im glad to be apart of this group all of you have been very helpful to me thank you once again for the help and you advice
n Thursday 30 December 2004 04:03 am, Dan
Hello,
You could also consider http://www.ipcop.org/. This will
stop just about anything.
Good luck. N.
- Original Message -
From:
neo
To: newbie@linux-mandrake.com
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 12:31
AM
Subject: [newbie] firewall
Thank you for all
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 01:25, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 26 November 2004 15:16, Jay Warwick wrote:
Yep, nothing related to the firewall left in updates.
jay
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 22:50, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 26 November 2004 14:12, Jay Warwick wrote:
How do I get
How do I get the firewall to accept my changes in 10.0?
Every time I change the settings they revert back to the previous
settings when I check.
I have tried logging out and back-in after the changes and even
rebooting.
Thanks
Jay
Want to
On Friday 26 November 2004 14:12, Jay Warwick wrote:
How do I get the firewall to accept my changes in 10.0?
Every time I change the settings they revert back to the previous
settings when I check.
I have tried logging out and back-in after the changes and even
rebooting.
Thanks
Jay
Yep, nothing related to the firewall left in updates.
jay
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 22:50, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 26 November 2004 14:12, Jay Warwick wrote:
How do I get the firewall to accept my changes in 10.0?
Every time I change the settings they revert back to the previous
On Friday 26 November 2004 15:16, Jay Warwick wrote:
Yep, nothing related to the firewall left in updates.
jay
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 22:50, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 26 November 2004 14:12, Jay Warwick wrote:
How do I get the firewall to accept my changes in 10.0?
Every time
On Monday 08 November 2004 00:55, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Saturday 06 November 2004 03:34 am, Eric Scott wrote:
Hold up. Reinstalling proftpd got me a default that worked...
supposedly... but then why does it say 220 (vsFTPd 2.0.1) when I ftp
into my domain. lol. Gee wizzle this is getting
On Saturday 06 November 2004 03:34 am, Eric Scott wrote:
Hold up. Reinstalling proftpd got me a default that worked...
supposedly... but then why does it say 220 (vsFTPd 2.0.1) when I ftp into
my domain. lol. Gee wizzle this is getting confusing. Here I thought I was
dealing with proFTP, and
Yo. In risk of showing my ignorance; how to I configure my firewall on
Mandrake 9.2? I need to make sure the FTP port is open. (FTP's not
working... and by golly if there's a firewall on it it wouldn't work then,
would it?) Anyway, I know nothing of firewalls and need some basics.
On Friday 05 November 2004 16:47, Eric Scott wrote:
Yo. In risk of showing my ignorance; how to I configure my firewall on
Mandrake 9.2? I need to make sure the FTP port is open. (FTP's not
working... and by golly if there's a firewall on it it wouldn't work then,
would it?) Anyway, I know
On Friday 05 November 2004 16:47, Eric Scott wrote:
Yo. In risk of showing my ignorance; how to I configure my firewall on
Mandrake 9.2? I need to make sure the FTP port is open. (FTP's not
working... and by golly if there's a firewall on it it wouldn't work
then, would it?) Anyway, I
Eric Scott wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 16:47, Eric Scott wrote:
Yo. In risk of showing my ignorance; how to I configure my firewall on
Mandrake 9.2? I need to make sure the FTP port is open. (FTP's not
working... and by golly if there's a firewall on it it wouldn't work
then, would it?)
On Friday 05 November 2004 11:52, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Eric Scott wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 16:47, Eric Scott wrote:
Yo. In risk of showing my ignorance; how to I configure my firewall on
Mandrake 9.2? I need to make sure the FTP port is open. (FTP's not
working... and by
On Friday 05 November 2004 17:43, Eric Scott wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 16:47, Eric Scott wrote:
Yo. In risk of showing my ignorance; how to I configure my firewall on
Mandrake 9.2? I need to make sure the FTP port is open. (FTP's not
working... and by golly if there's a
On Friday 05 November 2004 12:13, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 17:43, Eric Scott wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 16:47, Eric Scott wrote:
Yo. In risk of showing my ignorance; how to I configure my firewall
on Mandrake 9.2? I need to make sure the FTP port is open.
On Friday 05 November 2004 18:32, Eric Scott wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 12:13, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 17:43, Eric Scott wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 16:47, Eric Scott wrote:
Yo. In risk of showing my ignorance; how to I configure my
firewall
On Friday 05 November 2004 12:51, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 18:32, Eric Scott wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 12:13, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 17:43, Eric Scott wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 16:47, Eric Scott wrote:
Yo. In risk
Yo. In risk of showing my ignorance; how to I configure my
firewall on Mandrake 9.2? I need to make sure the FTP port is
open. (FTP's not working... and by golly if there's a firewall
on it it wouldn't work then, would it?) Anyway, I know nothing
of firewalls and
I have set up with much toil, blood, tears and sweat, a VMware virtual
network. However, this will only function with Shorewall switched off -
not a desirable state of affairs, I'm sure you will all agree.
The following output from dmesg seems relevant:
Shorewall:OUTPUT:REJECT:IN= OUT=vmnet1
Hello,
I tried to setup a firewall since my notebook will be personal...
I went to mandrake control center and removed the cross in no firewall
at the Drakfirewall.(I left all the boxes blank... hope this is good so)
Then It asked me if I want to install the shorewall package. I clicked
ok. I
On Thursday 27 November 2003 05:44, Cenora wrote:
How do I configure a powerful firewall in 9.2?
I never know what to block. I use mozilla, gtk-gnutella,
mozilla-mail and Licq.
Shorewall is on your CD's. Go to Mandrake Control Center --
Security-- Personal Firewall. Personally I uncheck
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:57:06 +
Kaj Haulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can verify that from a console, typing dmesg. After a few
minutes online you'll see an astonishing amount of rejected
penetration-attempts. And if you are curious, try whois
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx , whre the x's are the
How do I configure a powerful firewall in 9.2?
I never know what to block. I use mozilla, gtk-gnutella, mozilla-mail
and Licq.
Thanks
Carrot, The Warrior
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
This question relates to the older Mandrake Linux Firewall 7.2.
Through the firewall's admin functions I set up a public rule that allows
all SMTP inbound traffic through the firewall and forwards it to 192.168.3.3
Once I set up that rule everything works fine and the mailserver on
192.168.3.3
On Monday 17 Nov 2003 5:42 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
I have Shorewall set up on my laptop, but I am finding that my logs are
getting inundated with messages from Shorewall telling me about all the
packets being dropped from the Windows machines on my network.
How can I reduce the amount of
I have Shorewall set up on my laptop, but I am finding that my logs are
getting inundated with messages from Shorewall telling me about all the
packets being dropped from the Windows machines on my network.
How can I reduce the amount of logging that goes on and is it safe to do so.
Do I
Hello.
I urpmi'ed mldonkey but it won't connect to any server. It
will find files, but will fail to download them.
In MCC, I put down the firewall for testing purposes (to the
question which services would you like the internet to
connect to? I ticked everything (no firewall) (after
When I activated the firewall in LM9.1 I blocked the ability of my two w2k LAN
clients to see my samba server. No surprise. How can I allow the clients
(and hopefully only those clients) through the firewall?
TIA
Paul
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 12:32, Paul Kaplan wrote:
When I activated the firewall in LM9.1 I blocked the ability of my two w2k LAN
clients to see my samba server. No surprise. How can I allow the clients
(and hopefully only those clients) through the firewall?
TIA
Paul
Shorewall?
When i
On Tuesday 02 Sep 2003 11:32 am, Paul Kaplan wrote:
When I activated the firewall in LM9.1 I blocked the ability of my two w2k
LAN clients to see my samba server. No surprise. How can I allow the
clients (and hopefully only those clients) through the firewall?
TIA
Paul
Shorewall (as
Doh! I missed out a line. It should be :-
fwnet ACCEPT
fwmasqACCEPT
masq net ACCEPT
masqfw ACCEPT
net all DROPinfo
all all REJECT info
derek
--
--
www.jennings.homelinux.net
Thanks for the help Derek. /etc/shorewall/interfaces only had my
wireless card (eth1) set to the loc zone, instead of net. After
setting it, it's now working great.
Terry
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Friday 29 Aug 2003 3:50 pm, Terry Sheltra wrote:
I'm having some interesting happenings using
On Friday 29 Aug 2003 3:50 pm, Terry Sheltra wrote:
I'm having some interesting happenings using the Firewall utility in
MCC. I'm using a laptop that has both a wireless card, as well as a
wired NIC. My wireless works just fine until I try to turn on the
firewall. As soon as I do, the
Brandon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Sheltra
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 7:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Firewall Oddities
I'm having some interesting happenings using the Firewall utility in
MCC. I'm using
Russ,
quick question, do you have an old 486 laying around.. if so you should try
IPCOP..its quick and easy. and when your secure in your knowledge about
IPTABLES.. you can go and setup your linux box as a firewall.. I have a SOHO
setup in my private (home school) here in japan 12 boxes,
This may be OT but, I have to ask. The below is from my firestarter log, are
these incoming or outgoing hits to earthlinks news servers?
time:Jul 26 09:53:09 in:eth0 out: port:40478 source:news03.west.earthlink.net
dest:192.168.1.2 len:1440 tos:0x00 protocol:tcp service:unknown
time:Jul 26
On Tuesday 08 Jul 2003 00:41, Chris wrote:
I've setup firestarter and when I ran the test at www.grc.com all my
ports show closed except for 21, 23, and 80. I would think that these
should be at least closed. Anyone using firestarter know of how to do
this?
Thanks
Chris
I'm running
I've setup firestarter and when I ran the test at www.grc.com all my ports
show closed except for 21, 23, and 80. I would think that these should be at
least closed. Anyone using firestarter know of how to do this?
Thanks
Chris
--
Regards
Chris
A 100% Microsoft free computer
00:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Firewall logs getting too big
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 13:34, mycal62 wrote:
this is what that port does :
efs 520/tcpextended file name server
router 520/udplocal routing process (on site
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 13:34, mycal62 wrote:
this is what that port does :
efs 520/tcpextended file name server
router 520/udplocal routing process (on site);
# uses variant of Xerox NS routing
# information
Hello all,
Going through my firewall logs tends to get tedious i.e. the logfiles too big
because of the recurring nameserver scans by my IP on port 520.
Not only that but this permanent logging causes constant disk activity and
thus noise!:o(
Anybody got any simple pointers how to put a stop
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 11:18 pm, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
Hello all,
Going through my firewall logs tends to get tedious i.e. the logfiles too
big because of the recurring nameserver scans by my IP on port 520.
Not only that but this permanent logging causes constant disk activity and
thus
this is what that port does :
efs 520/tcpextended file name server
router 520/udplocal routing process (on site);
# uses variant of Xerox NS routing
# information protocol - RIP
here's a handy reference to all ports
Hi all,
Has anyone managed to get Firewall Builder to work under Mdk 9.0?
Installing the 8.2 rpm doesn't work. I get an error when trying to run it.
I also tried compiling it from the source rpm. Libfwbuilder compiles fine
but fwbuilder itself doesn't.
Does anybody know where I can get
A while back I was posting asking for some help with an SNF Install 2
NICs I had in the box.
It seemed one of them, a DLink, had a light on it like all NICs but the
light wouldn't go on at boot time. That seemed strange. So I thought it
was a dead card. Almost threw out a decent card!
Ya, I run it in KDE. I get the errors too, but they don't
affect how Firestarter actually works.
Miark
Tommy Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] saith:
Firestarter IS good... almost has that easy Zone Alarm interface that will
display hits live. However, firestarter was written for gnome. I can't
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:07:52 -0300
Damian G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:44:55 -0400
Tommy Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firestarter IS good... almost has that easy Zone Alarm interface that will
display hits live. However, firestarter was written for gnome. I can't
Hi all,
I've started messing around with Firewall Builder now and would like to
know people's opinion about it. And also about other firewall GUI's.
Ok, I know the best thing would be to write an iptables script by hand,
but I really don't have the time now. And with fwbuilder I can see the
]]On
Behalf Of Tommy EatonSent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:27
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [newbie] Need
Newbie Firewall recommendation
Hi,
I am looking for a good newbie
firewall to run on KDE on mdk 8.2.
The ideal firewall would be very similar to ZoneAlarm as far
In reply to Tommy's mail, d.d. Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:26:41 -0400:
programs, etc). I found Firestarter and it appears to be exactly what I'm
looking for. However, I cannot find it for KDE - only GNOME. Do any of
you know if it's possible to get Firestarter for KDE?
If you have the gnome
Hi,
I am looking for a good newbie firewall to run on KDE on mdk
8.2. The ideal firewall would be
very similar to ZoneAlarm as far as the interface is concerned (i.e. alerting
to hits, very simplistic, restricting in/out programs, etc). I found Firestarter and it appears to be
exactly
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, JL Conradie wrote:
Hi
I'm running the bastille-firewall included with mandrake 8.1. I use the
InteractiveBastille command to configure it. When I configure it, it asks which
interface is the public interface and what services to block from this interface, but
then it
Hi
I'm running the bastille-firewall included with
mandrake 8.1. I use the InteractiveBastille command to configure it.When I
configure it, it asks which interface is the public interface and what services
to block from this interface, but then it also blocks the services from the
other
JL Conradie wrote:
Hi
I'm running the bastille-firewall included with mandrake 8.1. I use
the InteractiveBastille command to configure it. When I configure it,
it asks which interface is the public interface and what services to
block from this interface, but then it also blocks the
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 11:59 am, you wrote:
Hi
I'm running the bastille-firewall included with mandrake 8.1. I use the
InteractiveBastille command to configure it. When I configure it, it asks
which interface is the public interface and what services to block from
this interface, but
Hello mike,
Monday, May 20, 2002, 11:30:32 PM, you wrote:
m Hi
m I have tried to set up a bastille firewall in LM 8.2
m after going through the InteractiveBastille setup
m the firewall is still not as secure as it was in 8.0.
m How can I set it up to where it will show ports as stealthed
- Original Message -
From: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:30 AM
Subject: [newbie] firewall broken in 8.2
Hi
I have tried to set up a bastille firewall in LM 8.2
after going through the InteractiveBastille setup
the firewall is still
Hi
I have tried to set up a bastille firewall in LM 8.2
after going through the InteractiveBastille setup
the firewall is still not as secure as it was in 8.0.
How can I set it up to where it will show ports as stealthed as in 8.0?
or how can I be surt it's actually secure once setup?
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 04:16:00 +0200, RM.Krijgsman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: After my problems, getting on the net with my USB modem, I now am
interested in a good firewall... I know I know I should read some howto's or
whatever, the fact is I don't have time for that, I just wan't a good firewall
On Friday 08 March 2002 01:38, Dr Joe Brand wrote:
iptables and Bastille are installed, but drakconf still can't find them.
I've removed them and reinstalled them to no avail.
I think there is a problem with drakconf and the wizards it uses.
When I start drakconf the following message
iptables and Bastille are installed, but drakconf still can't find them.
I've removed them and reinstalled them to no avail.
I think there is a problem with drakconf and the wizards it uses.
When I start drakconf the following message apears in the shell window
Subroutine _ redefined at
Where can I get information on configuring a firewall? The GUI in
drakconf is hosed. It says I need to install iptables and Basstille.
I would rather understand how to configure manually and what files need
to be edited.
Joe
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Dr Joe Brand wrote:
Where can I get information on configuring a firewall? The GUI in
drakconf is hosed. It says I need to install iptables and Basstille.
You could easily install iptables and Bastille to fix DrakConf, by issuing
the following commands, as root:
urpmi
there, Zone Alarm and so on, but since I don't use them, I
cannot comment on those.
HTH
Robin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stojs
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Firewall and win
I
Robin wrote:
Firewall can only block ports but not program specific, i.e., if you
block everything but leave web open, any web browser would work. If you
really want to lock it down to one program, i.e. Netscape instead of IE,
try something like Norton Personal Firewall. There are quite a few
Take a look at Tiny Personal Firewall as well, www.tinysoftware.com. It
has some insteresting features that are not available on ZoneAlarm. Tiny
is also free.
Rodrigo
Randy Kramer wrote:
Robin wrote:
Firewall can only block ports but not program specific, i.e., if you
block everything but
Rodrigo wrote:
Take a look at Tiny Personal Firewall as well, www.tinysoftware.com. It
has some insteresting features that are not available on ZoneAlarm. Tiny
is also free.
Rodrigo,
Thanks, I'll take a look.
Randy Kramer
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
I have a lan connection to the internet and would like to have one
smoothwall linux firewall computer connected to the internet. This
smoothwall would be connected to a mandrake linux computer wich would be
connected to a win2000 machine.
Is it possible to have the windows computer totally shut
Thanks to all that answered my mail !!!
The sites are very nice to test the firewall and also now I know that
iptables is the one that does the work.
Thank you all very much !
Rodrigo
Brian Parish wrote:
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 10:07, David Stevenson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:28:05 -0200
mike wrote:
Rodrigo wrote:
Hello all !
What is the best way to make a firewall for a desktop station ? There
aren't any servers running on my computer.
Right after installing mdk8.1 I ran the control center and set the
firewall answering the questions. Some time ago I decided to
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:28:05 -0200
Rodrigo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all !
What is the best way to make a firewall for a desktop station ? There
aren't any servers running on my computer.
Right after installing mdk8.1 I ran the control center and set the
firewall answering the
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 10:07, David Stevenson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:28:05 -0200
Rodrigo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all !
What is the best way to make a firewall for a desktop station ? There
aren't any servers running on my computer.
Right after installing mdk8.1 I ran the
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
