Going through the manual example i got an idea what typed and untyped is. When
the return type of a template is void the code within it is substituted. But
what happens when the return type is typed and untyped respectively.
We probably could use a better error message on inherited stack object, or
prevent them altogether if fields do not have the same types.
The overall part which may be going to get the part perfectly to handle it in
such part to enable it to
why "Projects like Nim and D can never be failures"? what is the common between
them? open source? what do you think about redlang
[https://www.red-lang.org](https://www.red-lang.org)/ which is said to promote
new idea of rebol language, however I think red lang is doomed to fail since it
Adding some more details to mirams answer: You are trying to put value objects
of different type and size into the same seq. But for seq and array all
elements must have the same size. With ref that works, because ref is basically
a pointer, and all have the same size. You may also consider sum
