[Nouveau] reply-to header

2009-12-30 Thread Xavier
Afaik the absence of that header is the reason that the reply button in mail clients or in gmail answers to the sender rather than to the mailing list. Does anyone know why that header is not included ? I consider it a must have for any mailing list, without reply-to it's quite impractical. Or is

Re: [Nouveau] reply-to header

2009-12-30 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:00:57PM +0100, Xavier wrote: Afaik the absence of that header is the reason that the reply button in mail clients or in gmail answers to the sender rather than to the mailing list. Does anyone know why that header is not included ? I consider it a must have for any

Re: [Nouveau] reply-to header

2009-12-30 Thread Jack
On 2009.12.30 14:00, Xavier wrote: Afaik the absence of that header is the reason that the reply button in mail clients or in gmail answers to the sender rather than to the mailing list. Does anyone know why that header is not included ? I consider it a must have for any mailing list,

Re: [Nouveau] reply-to header

2009-12-30 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, Marcin Slusarz wrote: On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:00:57PM +0100, Xavier wrote: Afaik the absence of that header is the reason that the reply button in mail clients or in gmail answers to the sender rather than to the mailing list. Does anyone know why that header is not included ? I

Re: [Nouveau] reply-to header

2009-12-30 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Erik Auerswald auers...@unix-ag.uni-kl.de wrote: No, it would omit them. Thus for open mailing lists no reply-to header should be used. At least some ML software can be configured to remove duplicates (i.e. don't send message to recipients in CC). Of course the