On 08/14/2012 11:49 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
Hi Rob
I'm taking over the answer, since Emilien (the coder) is on vacation...
Though he kindly took 5 mn to give me the rationales needed.
2012/8/10 Rob Crittenden rc...@greyoak.com mailto:rc...@greyoak.com
fredericb...@eaton.com wrote:
Hi Rob
I'm taking over the answer, since Emilien (the coder) is on vacation...
Though he kindly took 5 mn to give me the rationales needed.
2012/8/10 Rob Crittenden rc...@greyoak.com
fredericb...@eaton.com wrote:
Hello all,
In order to prepare the merge of the NSS branch to the trunk, I
Arnaud Quette wrote:
Hi Rob
I'm taking over the answer, since Emilien (the coder) is on vacation...
Though he kindly took 5 mn to give me the rationales needed.
2012/8/10 Rob Crittenden rc...@greyoak.com mailto:rc...@greyoak.com
fredericb...@eaton.com wrote:
Hello all,
Hello all,
In order to prepare the merge of the NSS branch to the trunk, I have validated
the code in this branch by passing this validation document written by Emilien
Kia :
http://www.networkupstools.org/tmp/NUT-NSS_Mini_DVT_Plan-final.pdf
The testing has been done on rev 3685 of the
On Aug 10, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
What is the value of creating two CA's? If you have one infrastructure, why
not have one CA and issue all certificates from that one CA?
Unless there is a step missing from page 4, I think the idea was that CA2 isn't
in the certs directory,
