Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with Multiple USB UPSs, including multiple apparent CyberPower

2023-01-14 Thread Charles Lepple via Nut-upsuser
On Jan 14, 2023, at 6:51 PM, Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser wrote: > > (Any clue how to get 2.8 included in the package provider for my Raspberry Pi > is presumably beyond the scope of this list, but if someone knows and wants > to let me know, I wouldn't complain...) Raspbian (assuming that's

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with Multiple USB UPSs, including multiple apparent CyberPower

2023-01-14 Thread Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser
Yeah, by the time I get to it it'll be out :) On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 4:00 PM Jim Klimov wrote: > Just a note: recent PRs are naturally not in 2.8.0 release (April 2022), > but would be in eventual 2.8.1 > > Jim > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023, 00:51 Bruce Pleat wrote: > >> Part of what made my life

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with Multiple USB UPSs, including multiple apparent CyberPower

2023-01-14 Thread Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser
Just a note: recent PRs are naturally not in 2.8.0 release (April 2022), but would be in eventual 2.8.1 Jim On Sun, Jan 15, 2023, 00:51 Bruce Pleat wrote: > Part of what made my life harder is nut-scanner isn't in the package. > > Once I get a chance, I'll update to 2.8, but that'll be a

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with Multiple USB UPSs, including multiple apparent CyberPower

2023-01-14 Thread Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser
Part of what made my life harder is nut-scanner isn't in the package. Once I get a chance, I'll update to 2.8, but that'll be a little while off. (Any clue how to get 2.8 included in the package provider for my Raspberry Pi is presumably beyond the scope of this list, but if someone knows and

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with Multiple USB UPSs, including multiple apparent CyberPower

2023-01-14 Thread Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser
Thanks! FWIW if you do get to test new code, https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1811 adds warnings for situations like yours. Would be great to check if it works actually, with many "same-serial" devices :) Jim On Sat, Jan 14, 2023, 23:39 Bruce Pleat wrote: > Thank you, looks like

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with Multiple USB UPSs, including multiple apparent CyberPower

2023-01-14 Thread Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser
Thank you, looks like the regex idiosyncracy might have been the issue. My current file: [sl] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto desc = "CyberPower UPS SL" product = "SL.*" productid = 0501 vendorid = 0764 #model = "SL Series" [ab]

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with Multiple USB UPSs, including multiple apparent CyberPower

2023-01-14 Thread Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser
So, regarding wildcards (globs) vs. regular expressions, the latter being used for such matches, I believe (did not check now) the config sections should look like this: [cp] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto desc = "CyberPower UPS CP" model = "CP685AVR-G"

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with Multiple USB UPSs, including multiple apparent CyberPower

2023-01-14 Thread Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser
Thank you both for answering. I tried with and without the "-x" as the manual wasn't clear enough to me. I tried with and without wildcards (e.g., "*SL*", "*SL Series*", "SL Series" for that one). I tried other permutations before asking for help here. ("model" throws an error, "-x model"

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Problem with Multiple USB UPSs, including multiple apparent CyberPower

2023-01-14 Thread Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser
Actually in merged PRs of recent weeks there can be several suitable fixes: 1) support for common USB matching parameters in more drivers (though usbhid-ups has long had it); 2) nut-scanner should provide more of these parameters in generated config sections, in particular "device" port numbers;