On Dec 21, 2023, at 1:13 PM, Tim Reimers KA4LFP wrote:
> Yet, a "file" command shows it to be an 32-bit ELF executable.
>
Although you mentioned that they are both running Debian bullseye, Pi2 is
64-bit capable, and it looks like the Raspbian image is 64-bit (aarch64 in the
/lib pathnames).
Spivey and Pi2 are in fact the same!
I was trying to be a little secure with the real hastname, but my secret is
out!
btw, speaking of security.selinux is disabled and the firewall is
disabled.
I did do chmod+x on the files and folders.
Also, running as user www-data, nut, or even root
Thanks so much for replying, Charles!
Question #1
Loaded from "apt-get install" on both platforms.
Not compiled from source on either one.
Libraries:
I'm confused too, given that someone else (the person in another blog,
who'd pointed out running the upsstats.cgi from the CLI) also said that the
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023, 13:11 Tim Reimers KA4LFP via Nut-upsuser
wrote:
- I have a RasPI (hereafter referred to as Pi1) running Bullseye in which
this all WORKS FINE
- I have a SECOND RasPI (hereafter referred to as Pi2) running Bullseye in
which ONLY the CGI scripts do not work.
I have
Well, it seems both apache and bash literally say they did not find an
executable there; it is not about NUT configs. Is the file present? (is
"spivey" same as "pi2" in "screenshots" posted?) Does it have the exec bit
set? Are all directories at least "executable" by apache user?
Jim
On Thu,
On Dec 20, 2023, at 5:17 PM, Tim Reimers KA4LFP via Nut-upsuser wrote:
>
> First, a summary:
> - I have a RasPI (hereafter referred to as Pi1) running Bullseye in which
> this all WORKS FINE -- the upsd/upsc/ monitor services, etc
> - I have a SECOND RasPI (hereafter referred to as Pi2)
Hi everyone --
I'm having a problem with the CGI scripts for NUT.
First, a summary:
- I have a RasPI (hereafter referred to as Pi1) running Bullseye in which
this all WORKS FINE -- the upsd/upsc/ monitor services, etc
- I have a SECOND RasPI (hereafter referred to as Pi2) running Bullseye in
