On Feb 17, 2024, at 7:57 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
Other than that, I think the mailing list service we get from alioth comes "as
is", not sure we can configure much about it. Can check, but not really inclined to
- let humans decide how to best post and what is correct for each case :)
On
The list appears to have settings enabled:
- modify the subject by adding [Nut-upsuser]
- add a footer
I believe these are controlled by the list administrator, in the same
way as reply_goes_to_list.
Both of these are, in the eyes of DKIM, attacks on the integrity of the
message.
I believe
On Feb 17, 2024, at 11:17 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> I would guess that reply-to is getting added because of header munging.
> Turn off munging and this all goes away.
Please re-read my email that explains the current setup of the list:
I would guess that reply-to is getting added because of header munging.
Turn off munging and this all goes away.
___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
On Feb 17, 2024, at 7:57 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>
> Other than that, I think the mailing list service we get from alioth comes
> "as is", not sure we can configure much about it. Can check, but not really
> inclined to - let humans decide how to best post and what is correct for each
> case :)
I sometimes get replies that are directed only to me.
Oftentimes it is a sender "error" to not have used Reply to All, so I
direct my response back to the list. Rarely it is about something the
senders deem confidential, where a pointed reply seems to make sense
(overriding would be bad).
Other
On Feb 17, 2024, at 3:29 AM, Roger Price wrote:
>
> Note that the Reply-To goes back to the original poster, not the list.
> Many mailing lists encourage the subscribers to "keep the list traffic on the
> list", rather than wandering off into private discussions. The nut-upsuser
> setup has
Reply-To: is about the *author*. On a list, people should "reply all"
and include the list, generally, unless they intend to send a private
reply. Having Reply-To set to the list violates standards and causes
the "reply" MUA action to send a reply to other than the author,
violating
On 17.02.24 09:29, Roger Price via Nut-upsuser wrote:
I recently wrote to the list. The distributed message had the
following headers:
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:22:59 +0100 (CET)
From: Roger Price via Nut-upsuser
Reply-To: Roger Price
To: nut-upsuser Mailing List
Subject: ...
Note that
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024, Harlan Stenn via Nut-upsuser wrote:
I'd bet the following is news to nobody.
Some of us Dislike setting Reply-To: at all.
Debian doesn't do it. Why should we?
If it exists, there's an expectation that it should be followed.
That's the problem for me - it exists and
I'd bet the following is news to nobody.
Some of us Dislike setting Reply-To: at all.
If it exists, there's an expectation that it should be followed. Some
folks will want to reply to the sender, others to the list. So no
matter which way is chosen, one group will be disappointed. An email
I recently wrote to the list. The distributed message had the following
headers:
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:22:59 +0100 (CET)
From: Roger Price via Nut-upsuser
Reply-To: Roger Price
To: nut-upsuser Mailing List
Subject: ...
Note that the Reply-To goes back to the original poster, not the
12 matches
Mail list logo
