Re: [Nut-upsuser] newhidups usb interface claiming warning

2006-09-17 Thread Denis Hainsworth
usb 1-1: usbfs: process 32652 (newhidups) did not claim interface 0 before use so I found two places where supposedly you guys have added code to address the above issue I am having. As far as I can tell I have a driver that is newer and should have the fixes. what am I missing? this is the

Re: [Nut-upsuser] newhidups, udev, usb, and frustration

2006-09-17 Thread Peter Selinger
Denis Hainsworth wrote: holy crap. just rpm'd the hotplug stuff for fc3. added an appropriate line to usb.usermap and a script that changes permissions and group and it just worked. Excellent. I have added your device F6C550-AVR (050d/0551) to our standard hotplug scripts in SVN as well.

Re: [Nut-upsuser] newhidups usb interface claiming warning

2006-09-17 Thread Peter Selinger
Denis Hainsworth wrote: usb 1-1: usbfs: process 32652 (newhidups) did not claim interface 0 before use so I found two places where supposedly you guys have added code to address the above issue I am having. Maybe you can tell us what two places you are talking about? -- Peter As far

Re: [Nut-upsuser] newhidups usb interface claiming warning

2006-09-17 Thread Denis Hainsworth
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Peter Selinger wrote: Denis Hainsworth wrote: usb 1-1: usbfs: process 32652 (newhidups) did not claim interface 0 before use so I found two places where supposedly you guys have added code to address the above issue I am having. Maybe

Re: [Nut-upsuser] newhidups usb interface claiming warning

2006-09-17 Thread Peter Selinger
Denis Hainsworth wrote: On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Peter Selinger wrote: Denis Hainsworth wrote: usb 1-1: usbfs: process 32652 (newhidups) did not claim interface 0 before use so I found two places where supposedly you guys have added code to address the