Re: [Nut-upsuser] ACL problem

2007-12-23 Thread Arjen de Korte
Is there a chance you can try this with the latest release (2.2.1), which has some patches suggested by RedHat to improve IPv6 support? The changes in nut-2.2.1 (and nut-2.2.0 also) are *very* loosy based on suggestions made by Dan Kopecek, who wasn't working for RedHat at the time he submitted

Re: [Nut-upsuser] ACL problem

2007-12-23 Thread Charles Lepple
On Dec 23, 2007 4:37 PM, Arjen de Korte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a chance you can try this with the latest release (2.2.1), which has some patches suggested by RedHat to improve IPv6 support? The changes in nut-2.2.1 (and nut-2.2.0 also) are *very* loosy based on suggestions made

Re: [Nut-upsuser] ACL problem

2007-12-22 Thread Richard Chapman
Hi all Is the syntax: ACL lan 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 allowed and correct? Shouldn't it be: ACL lan 10.0.0.0/8 If both notations are allowed in the same syntax - it is news to me - but then many things are news to me...:-) Richard. Charles Lepple wrote: On Dec 21, 2007 11:07 AM, Ricardo

[Nut-upsuser] ACL problem

2007-12-21 Thread Ricardo Bugalho
Hello, I'm unable to connect to upsd from anywhere except localhost and the debugging output is a bit weird. It looks like acl_check doesn't match even against 0/0. Here's my ACL on upsd.conf: ACL all 0.0.0.0/0 ACL localhost 127.0.0.1/32 ACL lan 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 ACCEPT localhost lan REJECT