Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-10 Thread Charles Lepple
On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:56 PM, Steve Read sd_r...@hotmail.com wrote: Boy, I guess I got that one wrong. When I run nmap on the master it does say that port 3493 is open which is expected. So then what you are telling me means the ports are open. In other words I don't have a firewall

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-10 Thread Steve Read
? Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not From: clep...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 07:34:44 -0500 CC: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org To: sd_r...@hotmail.com On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:56 PM, Steve Read sd_r...@hotmail.com wrote: Boy, I guess I got that one wrong. When I run nmap

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-10 Thread Stan Gammons
On 11/10/14 16:54, Steve Read wrote: On the slave which is 192.168.0.6 in /var/log/daemon.log I see entries of: Nov 10 17:43:03 server2 upsmon[2120]: Poll UPS [root@192.168.0.7] failed - [root] does not exist on server 192.168.0.7 In upsmon.conf I have one entry: MONITOR root@192.168.0.7 1

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-10 Thread Stan Gammons
line should be MONITOR sdrups@192.168.0.7 upsmon autocadba2 slave Stan Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:03:46 -0600 From: sg063...@gmail.com To: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-09 Thread Steve Read
I would like to verify my understanding keeping in mind I have a one master and one slave computer. When the master gets the low batt/noAC signal it initiates a broadcast packet(s) on port 3493. 1) Is this correct? Then the slave computer must have this port open and it listens on this port for

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-09 Thread Charles Lepple
On Nov 9, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Steve Read sd_r...@hotmail.com wrote: I would like to verify my understanding keeping in mind I have a one master and one slave computer. When the master gets the low batt/noAC signal it initiates a broadcast packet(s) on port 3493. 1) Is this correct? No,

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-09 Thread Steve Read
: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not From: clep...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 16:31:22 -0500 CC: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org To: sd_r...@hotmail.com On Nov 9, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Steve Read sd_r...@hotmail.com wrote: I would like to verify my understanding keeping in mind I have

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-08 Thread Charles Lepple
[Please use reply-all to keep the discussion on the list, thanks] On Nov 6, 2014, at 10:19 PM, Charles Lepple clep...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 6, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Steve Read sd_r...@hotmail.com wrote: I am presently upgrading my servers. The old ones are running Suse 10.1 and I am

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-08 Thread Steve Read
will want to add LISTEN 0.0.0.0 to /etc/nut/upsd.conf. After restarting NUT, netstat should look like this: I think you mean the client? Steve Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not From: clep...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 09:00:12 -0500 CC: nut-upsuser

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-08 Thread Charles Lepple
On Nov 8, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Steve Read sd_r...@hotmail.com wrote: Thank you Charles, I am hoping fiddle with that sometime today or tomorrow. But I have another question, when you ask me to modify various files I am confused as to weather you mean on the server, client or both? So in

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-08 Thread Steve Read
to provide many hours of run time. Anyway, I plan to look into this later on. Thank you - Steve Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not From: clep...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 11:00:39 -0500 CC: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org To: sd_r...@hotmail.com On Nov 8, 2014, at 10:34

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-07 Thread Stan Gammons
I don't see a upsmon.conf in the original post. Shouldn't the clients have upsmon running on them rather than upsd? Stan On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Charles Lepple clep...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 6, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Steve Read sd_r...@hotmail.com wrote: I am presently upgrading my

[Nut-upsuser] Master Works, Slave Does Not

2014-11-06 Thread Steve Read
Hello, I am presently upgrading my servers. The old ones are running Suse 10.1 and I am upgrading to the most recent Debian. Oh, and I am not an IT guy rather a hacker who loves Linux and seems to enjoy getting myself confused. Presently I am trying to get the Nut running and am having