On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Peter McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply Carlos.
The ignoreoff suggestion didn't work. The driver appeared to not connect.
Hmmm, my bad. I only added the ignoreoff option _after_ 2.2.1.
The Temp reading has never worked returning 0.0.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2008 09:49:12 +0100, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Peter McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Temp reading has never worked returning 0.0.
That means the UPS doesn't have a
On Mon, 5 May 2008 09:49:12 +0100, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Peter McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Temp reading has never worked returning 0.0.
That means the UPS doesn't have a temperature sensor.
Wouldn't it be better if the driver didn't expose the
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I know, mine always returns 29.2... Too bad that the manufacturers
don't make it clearer when a thermal sensor is present and when it's
not.
And it would be easy to do. The protocol specifies that an
non-existent
On Mon, 05 May 2008 00:39:43 +0400, Jamie Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I've just run the same binaries on my new test machine, and I get the
following output:
Network UPS Tools 2.2.1- - Megatec protocol driver 1.5.9 [megatec_usb]
Carlos Rodrigues (c) 2003-2007
Serial-over-USB
On Mon, 05 May 2008 02:38:42 +0400, Jamie Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander I. Gordeev wrote:
snip
Also please try version 2.2.2-pre3 released today:
http://www.networkupstools.org/source.html
Done:
tester:/usr/local/ups# ./bin/megatec_usb - -u root -a plexus
Network UPS
6 matches
Mail list logo
