[Nut-upsuser] driver error

2011-09-14 Thread Steve Boyle
Hi,

I'm trying to install NUT on Ubuntu.  All is good until I try to start the 
driver, then I get this error:
$ sudo upsdrvctl start
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3
Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.34 (2.4.3)
USB communication driver 0.31
This APC device (051d:0003) is not (or perhaps not yet) supported
by usbhid-ups. Please make sure you have an up-to-date version of NUT. If
this does not fix the problem, try running the driver with the
'-x productid=0003' option. Please report your results to the NUT user's
mailing list nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org.

No matching HID UPS found
Driver failed to start (exit status=1)


I'm using an APC SmartUPS  1500 VA 120V RM2U, it is connected via USB.  I would 
appreciate any suggestions from the list.  Looks like apt-get install gave me 
version 2.4.3, apt also claims this is the latest version.

Thanks,
Steve Boyle

___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Re: [Nut-upsuser] driver error

2011-09-14 Thread Charles Lepple

On Sep 14, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Steve Boyle wrote:


Hi,

I’m trying to install NUT on Ubuntu.  All is good until I try to  
start the driver, then I get this error:

$ sudo upsdrvctl start
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3
Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.34 (2.4.3)
USB communication driver 0.31
This APC device (051d:0003) is not (or perhaps not yet) supported
by usbhid-ups. Please make sure you have an up-to-date version of  
NUT. If

this does not fix the problem, try running the driver with the
'-x productid=0003' option. Please report your results to the NUT  
user's

mailing list nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org.

No matching HID UPS found
Driver failed to start (exit status=1)


I’m using an APC SmartUPS  1500 VA 120V RM2U, it is connected via  
USB.  I would appreciate any suggestions from the list.  Looks like  
apt-get install gave me version 2.4.3, apt also claims this is the  
latest version.


APC 5G units with that product ID are supported as of NUT 2.6.0, which  
is available in Ubuntu natty and later.


Usually we would encourage you to follow the advice in the error  
message, and add -x productid=0003 to the command line of the  
driver, but judging from the changes necessary to support these units,  
I think you would have better luck bugging the Ubuntu LTS folks for a  
backport of the latest version of NUT.___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Re: [Nut-upsuser] driver error

2011-09-14 Thread Steve Boyle
Hi,

Actually, I just got it working.  I found this thread:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.monitoring.nut.user/6546

I downloaded the 2.6.1 source and found the entry I needed to add to 
52-nut-usbups.rules.  I also had to add productid = 0003 to the ups.conf file. 
Seems to be working now.

Are there new features for this the APC SmartUPS G5 that I would benefit from 
by upgrading to 2.6.x?

Thanks,
Steve Boyle


From: Charles Lepple [mailto:clep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:48 PM
To: Steve Boyle
Cc: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] driver error

On Sep 14, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Steve Boyle wrote:


Hi,

I'm trying to install NUT on Ubuntu.  All is good until I try to start the 
driver, then I get this error:
$ sudo upsdrvctl start
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3
Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.34 (2.4.3)
USB communication driver 0.31
This APC device (051d:0003) is not (or perhaps not yet) supported
by usbhid-ups. Please make sure you have an up-to-date version of NUT. If
this does not fix the problem, try running the driver with the
'-x productid=0003' option. Please report your results to the NUT user's
mailing list 
nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.orgmailto:nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org.

No matching HID UPS found
Driver failed to start (exit status=1)


I'm using an APC SmartUPS  1500 VA 120V RM2U, it is connected via USB.  I would 
appreciate any suggestions from the list.  Looks like apt-get install gave me 
version 2.4.3, apt also claims this is the latest version.

APC 5G units with that product ID are supported as of NUT 2.6.0, which is 
available in Ubuntu natty and later.

Usually we would encourage you to follow the advice in the error message, and 
add -x productid=0003 to the command line of the driver, but judging from the 
changes necessary to support these units, I think you would have better luck 
bugging the Ubuntu LTS folks for a backport of the latest version of NUT.
___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Re: [Nut-upsuser] driver error

2011-09-14 Thread Charles Lepple
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Steve Boyle steve.bo...@connexity.com wrote:
 Hi,



 Actually, I just got it working.  I found this thread:

 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.monitoring.nut.user/6546



 I downloaded the 2.6.1 source and found the entry I needed to add to
 52-nut-usbups.rules.  I also had to add productid = 0003 to the ups.conf
 file. Seems to be working now.

Adding productid = 0003 is equivalent to the -x option mentioned.

 Are there new features for this the APC SmartUPS G5 that I would benefit
 from by upgrading to 2.6.x?

Not so much a feature as preventing problems down the road, you may
want to add the pollonly flag per this discussion from an APC
employee:

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2010-June/004847.html

(I didn't check that before; for some reason I thought pollonly wasn't
available in 2.4.3 yet)

-- 
- Charles Lepple

___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser


Re: [Nut-upsuser] driver error

2011-09-14 Thread Steve Boyle
Cool, thanks for the tip.  Most appreciated.

Regards,
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Charles Lepple [mailto:clep...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 5:07 PM
To: Steve Boyle
Cc: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] driver error

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Steve Boyle steve.bo...@connexity.com wrote:
 Hi,



 Actually, I just got it working.  I found this thread:

 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.monitoring.nut.user/6546



 I downloaded the 2.6.1 source and found the entry I needed to add to 
 52-nut-usbups.rules.  I also had to add productid = 0003 to the 
 ups.conf file. Seems to be working now.

Adding productid = 0003 is equivalent to the -x option mentioned.

 Are there new features for this the APC SmartUPS G5 that I would 
 benefit from by upgrading to 2.6.x?

Not so much a feature as preventing problems down the road, you may want to add 
the pollonly flag per this discussion from an APC
employee:

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2010-June/004847.html

(I didn't check that before; for some reason I thought pollonly wasn't 
available in 2.4.3 yet)

--
- Charles Lepple

___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser


Re: [Nut-upsuser] Slaves under Squeeze

2011-09-14 Thread Charles Lepple
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Rob Donovan hikerman2005-...@yahoo.com wrote:
 hi,
    I recently upgraded my Debian Lenny system to Squeeze, and have been
 happily running nut as a MODE=standalone system talking to my Cyberpower
 1500 avr lcd via the usbhid-ups driver for a couple of weeks or so.  No
 problems.

   Now I'm trying to hang another machine off the same ups as a slave, and it
 isn't working.  The problem I'm getting is best illustrated by what happens
 when I run this on the server:

 upsd -D
 Network UPS Tools upsd 2.4.3
  0.00     listen_add: added 127.0.0.1:3493
  0.70     listen_add: added 192.168.1.104:3493
  0.000117     setuptcp: try to bind to 192.168.1.104 port 3493
  0.000204     setuptcp: bind: Cannot assign requested address
  0.000226     not listening on 192.168.1.104 port 3493

The short answer is that the listen directive specifies the address
on the *server* that will be used for listening.

I think you're trying to specify that the server should only listen to
that one slave. Those rules are best handled by the system firewall
(and/or by tcp_wrappers), which is why we dropped the ACL syntax from
NUT.

Your choices for the listen directive are basically any of the
addresses shown in 'ifconfig', or 0.0.0.0 to listen on all IPv4
interfaces.

-- 
- Charles Lepple

___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser


Re: [Nut-upsuser] Slaves under Squeeze

2011-09-14 Thread Rob Donovan

Thanks - that brought me more progress than I've seen all day :)


Changing to the following on the server :

upsd.conf:
LISTEN 0.0.0.0

with no other changes from what I posted on the previous page got both 
the server and slave nuts starting up ok.



For the record ifconfig on the server returns the following:

eth0Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:26:b9:8d:18:b5
 inet addr:192.168.1.102  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
 inet6 addr: fe80::226:b9ff:fe8d:18b5/64 Scope:Link
 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
 RX packets:7078694 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
 TX packets:7756421 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
 RX bytes:973255191 (928.1 MiB)  TX bytes:1064820280 (1015.4 MiB)
 Interrupt:16

loLink encap:Local Loopback
 inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
 RX packets:12697367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
 TX packets:12697367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
 RX bytes:1351490194 (1.2 GiB)  TX bytes:1351490194 (1.2 GiB)

Instead of LISTENing to 0.0.0.0 I tried LISTENing to 192.168.1.102 or 
00:26:b9:8d:18:b5 or fe80::226:b9ff:fe8d:18b5/64 but none worked when 
running /etc/init.d/nut start on the server (all gave immediate 
Communications with UPS cp1500avr1@localhost lost errors).




___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser


Re: [Nut-upsuser] Slaves under Squeeze

2011-09-14 Thread Rob Donovan

Changing to the following on the server :

upsd.conf:
LISTEN 127.0.0.1
LISTEN 192.168.1.102

also works :)




___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser


Re: [Nut-upsuser] Slaves under Squeeze

2011-09-14 Thread Charles Lepple

On Sep 14, 2011, at 9:19 PM, Rob Donovan wrote:


Changing to the following on the server :

upsd.conf:
LISTEN 127.0.0.1
LISTEN 192.168.1.102

also works :)


:-)

The typical application for listening on just a subset of the  
interfaces is on a gateway machine, where you want to allow access  
from the inside network, but not from the outside. That usually means  
more than one physical network interface (not counting loopback).  
Again, it is best backed up by firewall rules.


___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser