Anton Potehin wrote:
We have a question on this property. Is it really preferred to set this
parameter several times greater than number of available hosts? We do
not understand why it should be so?
It should be at least numHosts*mapred.tasktracker.tasks.maximum, so that
all of the task
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why we need parameter mapred.map.tasks greater than number of available
host? If we set it equal to number of host, we got negative progress
percentages problem.
Can you please post a simple example that demonstrates the negative
progress problem? E.g., the minimal
, November 22, 2005 2:10 AM
To: nutch-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: mapred.map.tasks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why we need parameter mapred.map.tasks greater than number of available
host? If we set it equal to number of host, we got negative progress
percentages problem.
Can you please post
