Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-08

2023-01-12 Thread Vittorio Bertocci
Thank you Roman for the super prompt and thorough review! We went ahead and published draft -10 incorporating your feedback and the changes described below. We are happy to make further changes as necessary, of course. Comments Inline >** The text uses the phrase "authentication level" a few

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-10.txt

2023-01-12 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF. Title : OAuth 2.0 Step-up Authentication Challenge Protocol Authors : Vittorio Bertocci

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-09.txt

2023-01-12 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF. Title : OAuth 2.0 Step-up Authentication Challenge Protocol Authors : Vittorio Bertocci

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [SENDER VERFICATION FAILED] Re: Privacy considerations regarding RAR and authorization_details in AT JWT

2023-01-12 Thread Steinar Noem
Hi Kai! The selective disclosure draft has a take on how to preserve privacy which I think is promising and seems fitting for some scenarios that I work with. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt-02.html Regarding RAR I guess that handling the privacy issues

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [SENDER VERFICATION FAILED] Re: Privacy considerations regarding RAR and authorization_details in AT JWT

2023-01-12 Thread Kai Lehmann
Hi Justin (and Brian), (I somehow only received the reply from Brian and not the one from Justin.) I agree that the privacy issue is broader than RAR itself as any claim inside of the JWT could potentially hold private information. Although I understand that nested JWTs can be used to encrypt