Re: Review Request 130219: Enable background color to be changed from settings

2017-08-17 Thread Albert Freeman
> On Aug. 9, 2017, 6:24 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Thanks for contributing to Okular :) > > > > Why would you need a different background color? > > Albert Freeman wrote: > I personally much prefer black as a background color. > > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Maybe you could

[okular] [Bug 383651] Custom/image stamp annotations are not saved into the PDF file in a way that can be printed or that other readers can see

2017-08-17 Thread Anderson Medeiros Gomes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651 Anderson Medeiros Gomes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amg1...@gmail.com

[okular] [Bug 383651] Custom/image stamp annotations are not saved into the PDF file in a way that can be printed or that other readers can see

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651 --- Comment #1 from Nate Graham --- Is this caused 100% by https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23108? Or are there other things that need to be done if/once poppler adds appearance streams for rubber stamps? -- You are

[okular] [Bug 301774] Wish: New option to save embedded annotation upon change/document close

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301774 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com --

[okular] [Bug 315552] Allow save annotations directly to original pdf file

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315552 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com ---

[okular] [Bug 335045] want to creat an own stamp within annotations

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335045 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

[okular] [Bug 353400] Okular's annotations (stored directly in the pdf file) won't show in a few other pdf readers

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353400 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com --

[okular] [Bug 151614] store annotations with documents

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com --

[okular] [Bug 159005] Print document with annotations

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159005 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com

[okular] [Bug 159007] Personal gallery od stamps

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159007 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com

[okular] [Bug 275371] Stamp annotations are drawn by both poppler and Okular

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275371 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com --

[okular] [Bug 330518] Add configure icon to the annotation toolbar

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330518 --- Comment #6 from Nate Graham --- Looks like that patch never made it in, so this request is still available for people to work on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 383649] Okular stamp tool doesn't allow the use of arbitrary images, only a fixed list

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383649 --- Comment #2 from Nate Graham --- Thanks Albert. I was able to use it successfully! It could be made a bit more discoverable, though. For that, I have filed https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383652 -- You are receiving

[okular] [Bug 363298] Allow users to define custom stamp to use with the review functions.

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363298 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[okular] [Bug 383652] New: Okular stamp tool's custom image support could be more discoverable

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383652 Bug ID: 383652 Summary: Okular stamp tool's custom image support could be more discoverable Product: okular Version: 1.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux

[okular] [Bug 383651] New: Custom/image stamp annotations are not saved into the PDF file in a way that can be printed or that other readers can see

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651 Bug ID: 383651 Summary: Custom/image stamp annotations are not saved into the PDF file in a way that can be printed or that other readers can see Product: okular

[okular] [Bug 358057] [Usability] Permanent/sticky annotation feature is hard to discover

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358057 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com --

[okular] [Bug 361292] Import annotations from a different file

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361292 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com ---

[okular] [Bug 370382] Using non-default size for custom stamp pixelates the stamp

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370382 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pointedst...@zoho.com

[okular] [Bug 383649] Okular stamp tool doesn't allow the use of arbitrary images, only a fixed list

2017-08-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383649 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aa...@kde.org

[okular] [Bug 383649] New: Okular stamp tool doesn't allow the use of arbitrary images, only a fixed list

2017-08-17 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383649 Bug ID: 383649 Summary: Okular stamp tool doesn't allow the use of arbitrary images, only a fixed list Product: okular Version: 1.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages

Re: Review Request 130226: CHM Generator Lib Update

2017-08-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
> On ago. 16, 2017, 9:58 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > What do they use instead of khtml? Some other html renderer? > > Gilbert Assaf wrote: > QtWebKit Do we want to use that? Or do maybe as a second step? I.e. this first and then evaluate if we want to move to qtwekbit? Also what

[okular] [Bug 383589] Annotation toolbar icons are blurry on a Hidpi screen

2017-08-17 Thread rkflx
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383589 Henrik (rkflx) changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

Re: Review Request 130226: CHM Generator Lib Update

2017-08-17 Thread Gilbert Assaf
> On Aug. 16, 2017, 9:58 nachm., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > What do they use instead of khtml? Some other html renderer? QtWebKit - Gilbert --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: